Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

949 questions · 1,008 findings · 130 reviews · Gynaecology and Fertility

No studies found 195 · 19.3%GRADE not reported 30 · 3%Very low 346 · 34.3%Low 323 · 32%Moderate 101 · 10%High 13 · 1.3%

Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy vs hysterectomy without opportunistic salpingectomy

Surgery‐related adverse events: intraoperative complications · premenopausal women undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynaecological indications

It is very uncertain whether hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy changes surgery‐related adverse events: intraoperative complications compared with hysterectomy without opportunistic salpingectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy vs hysterectomy without opportunistic salpingectomy

Surgery‐related adverse events: short‐term postoperative complications · premenopausal women undergoing hysterectomy for benign gynaecological indications

It is very uncertain whether hysterectomy with opportunistic salpingectomy changes surgery‐related adverse events: short‐term postoperative complications compared with hysterectomy without opportunistic salpingectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Any anti‐adhesion therapy vs placebo or no treatment following operative hysteroscopy

Live birth · women treated by operative hysteroscopy for uterine pathology associated with subfertility or adverse pregnancy outcome

It is very uncertain whether any anti‐adhesion therapy changes live birth a compared with placebo or no treatment following operative hysteroscopy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

Total oocytes ‐ Normoresponders ‐ Donor oocytes ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol ‐ Fresh embryo transfer (MPA 10 mg/day versus GnRH antagonists) · assisted reproduction technology cycles
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

Total oocytes ‐ PCOS (high‐responders) ‐ Own oocytes ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol ‐ Frozen embryo transfer (micronised progesterone 100 mg/day versus GnRH antagonists) · assisted reproduction technology cycles
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

MII oocytes ‐ PCOS (high‐responders) ‐ Own oocytes ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol ‐ Frozen embryo transfer (micronised progesterone 100 mg/day versus GnRH antagonists) · assisted reproduction technology cycles
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

Duration of stimulation (days) ‐ PCOS (high‐responders) ‐ Own oocytes ‐ Early phase stimulation protocol ‐ Frozen embryo transfer (micronised progesterone 100 mg/day versus GnRH antagonists) · assisted reproduction technology cycles
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

Total dose of gonadotropins (IU) ‐ Normoresponders ‐ Donor oocytes ‐ Early ophase stimulation protocol ‐ Fresh embryo transfer (MPA 10 mg/day versus GnRH antagonists · assisted reproduction technology cycles
1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

Oocyte pick‐up cancellation · assisted reproduction technology cycles

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens showed no clear difference in oocyte pick‐up cancellation ‐ total compared with gnRH antagonists (low certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Progestogens vs GnRH antagonists

Total dose of gonadotropins (IU) ‐ PCOS (high‐responders) ‐ Own oocytes ‐ Early phase stumulation protocol ‐ Frozen embryo transfer (micronised progesterone 100 mg/day versus GnRH antagonists) · assisted reproduction technology cycles
1 finding from 1 review