Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,511 questions · 2,668 findings · 290 reviews

No studies found 743 · 27.8%GRADE not reported 329 · 12.3%Very low 775 · 29%Low 484 · 18.1%Moderate 279 · 10.5%High 58 · 2.2%

Extended vs short duration antibiotics

Graft loss including death · solid organ transplant recipients

It is very uncertain whether extended changes graft loss (including death with functioning graft) Time frame: 30… compared with short duration antibiotics (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Extended vs short duration antibiotics

Other infection: septicaemia Time frame: 2 to 6 weeks · solid organ transplant recipients

It is very uncertain whether extended changes other infection: septicaemia Time frame: 30 days compared with short duration antibiotics (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Extended vs short duration antibiotics

Other infection: pneumonia Time frame: 30 days · solid organ transplant recipients

It is very uncertain whether extended changes other infection: pneumonia Time frame: 30 days compared with short duration antibiotics (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

One uterine devascularisation technique (uterine arterial embolisation) vs another uterine devascularisation technique (surgical devascularisation plus B‐Lynch)

Serious maternal morbidity (renal or respiratory failure, cardiac arrest or multiple organ failure) · treating primary postpartum haemorrhage

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

One uterine devascularisation technique (uterine arterial embolisation) vs another uterine devascularisation technique (surgical devascularisation plus B‐Lynch)

Number of women with total blood loss 1000 mL or more after randomisation · treating primary postpartum haemorrhage

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

One uterine devascularisation technique (uterine arterial embolisation) vs another uterine devascularisation technique (surgical devascularisation plus B‐Lynch)

Blood transfusion (red cell or whole blood) · treating primary postpartum haemorrhage

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

One uterine devascularisation technique (uterine arterial embolisation) vs another uterine devascularisation technique (surgical devascularisation plus B‐Lynch)

Side effects of the intervention (e.g. trauma, necrosis) · treating primary postpartum haemorrhage

It is very uncertain whether one uterine devascularisation technique (uterine arterial… changes side effects of the intervention (e.g. trauma, necrosis) compared with another uterine devascularisation technique (surgical… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review