Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,315 questions · 23,557 findings · 2,311 reviews

No studies found 4,183 · 17.8%GRADE not reported 3,930 · 16.7%Very low 5,371 · 22.8%Low 5,787 · 24.6%Moderate 3,320 · 14.1%High 966 · 4.1%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Pressure‐garment therapy (PGT) vs no treatment/lanolin

Scar improvement (POSAS) (0–10, higher score = more severe scarring) · people with burn wounds likely to develop hypertrophic scarring
2 findings from 1 review

Pressure‐garment therapy (PGT) vs silicone

Scar improvement (POSAS) (0–10, higher score = more severe scarring) · people with burn wounds likely to develop hypertrophic scarring
2 findings from 1 review

Negative pressure wound therapy vs standard dressing

Mortality (proportion of participants dying in each group at · adult patients with surgical wounds healing by primary closure

Negative pressure wound therapy showed no clear difference in mortality (proportion of participants dying in each group at compared with standard dressing (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Negative pressure wound therapy vs standard dressing

Surgical site infection · adult patients with surgical wounds healing by primary closure

Negative pressure wound therapy probably leads to lower surgical site infection (proportion of participants in each group… compared with standard dressing (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Negative pressure wound therapy vs standard dressing

Wound dehiscence · adult patients with surgical wounds healing by primary closure

Negative pressure wound therapy showed no clear difference in dehiscence (proportion of participants in each group with wound… compared with standard dressing (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Negative pressure wound therapy vs standard dressing

Seroma (proportion of participants in each group with seroma; · adult patients with surgical wounds healing by primary closure

Negative pressure wound therapy showed no clear difference in seroma (proportion of participants in each group with seroma; compared with standard dressing (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Negative pressure wound therapy vs standard dressing

Haematoma (proportion of participants in each group with haematoma; · adult patients with surgical wounds healing by primary closure

It is very uncertain whether negative pressure wound therapy changes haematoma (proportion of participants in each group with haematoma; compared with standard dressing (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Negative pressure wound therapy vs standard dressing

Skin blisters (proportion of participants in each group with at least one skin blister; · adult patients with surgical wounds healing by primary closure

Negative pressure wound therapy may leads to higher skin blisters (proportion of participants in each group with at… compared with standard dressing (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Presence of oral Candida albicans vs Absence of oral Candida albicans

Early childhood caries (ECC) · Children aged ≤6 years (early childhood)

RETRACTED. Among studies before 2017, oral C. albicans presence was associated with higher odds of ECC (OR 4.89, 95% CI 2.79-8.58); ungraded subgroup from a retracted review.

16 findings from 1 review
Show 13 more findings