Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

900 questions · 932 findings · 149 reviews

No studies found 215 · 23.1%GRADE not reported 65 · 7%Very low 234 · 25.1%Low 256 · 27.5%Moderate 134 · 14.4%High 28 · 3%

Summary of findings table ‐ Intermittent PEG‐asparaginase treatment (8 doses, 1000 IU/m2, IM) vs continuous PEG‐asparaginase treatment (15 doses, 1000 IU/m2, IM)

Event‐free survival · children and adolescents (< 18 years of age) with first‐line ALL

Summary of findings table ‐ Intermittent PEG‐asparaginase treatment… showed no clear difference in event‐free survival compared with continuous PEG‐asparaginase treatment (15 doses, 1000 IU/m2, IM) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Intermittent PEG‐asparaginase treatment (8 doses, 1000 IU/m2, IM) vs continuous PEG‐asparaginase treatment (15 doses, 1000 IU/m2, IM)

Hypersensitivity · children and adolescents (< 18 years of age) with first‐line ALL

Summary of findings table ‐ Intermittent PEG‐asparaginase treatment… showed no clear difference in hypersensitivity compared with continuous PEG‐asparaginase treatment (15 doses, 1000 IU/m2, IM) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Intermittent PEG‐asparaginase treatment (8 doses, 1000 IU/m2, IM) vs continuous PEG‐asparaginase treatment (15 doses, 1000 IU/m2, IM)

Pancreatitis · children and adolescents (< 18 years of age) with first‐line ALL

Summary of findings table ‐ Intermittent PEG‐asparaginase treatment… probably leads to lower pancreatitis compared with continuous PEG‐asparaginase treatment (15 doses, 1000 IU/m2, IM) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Intermittent PEG‐asparaginase treatment (8 doses, 1000 IU/m2, IM) vs continuous PEG‐asparaginase treatment (15 doses, 1000 IU/m2, IM)

Thromboembolism · children and adolescents (< 18 years of age) with first‐line ALL

Summary of findings table ‐ Intermittent PEG‐asparaginase treatment… showed no clear difference in thromboembolism compared with continuous PEG‐asparaginase treatment (15 doses, 1000 IU/m2, IM) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Intermittent PEG‐asparaginase treatment (8 doses, 1000 IU/m2, IM) vs continuous PEG‐asparaginase treatment (15 doses, 1000 IU/m2, IM)

Osteonecrosis · children and adolescents (< 18 years of age) with first‐line ALL

Summary of findings table ‐ Intermittent PEG‐asparaginase treatment… showed no clear difference in osteonecrosis compared with continuous PEG‐asparaginase treatment (15 doses, 1000 IU/m2, IM) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Intermittent PEG‐asparaginase treatment (8 doses, 1000 IU/m2, IM) vs continuous PEG‐asparaginase treatment (15 doses, 1000 IU/m2, IM)

Asparaginase‐associated toxicity · children and adolescents (< 18 years of age) with first‐line ALL

Summary of findings table ‐ Intermittent PEG‐asparaginase treatment… probably leads to lower asparaginase‐associated toxicity compared with continuous PEG‐asparaginase treatment (15 doses, 1000 IU/m2, IM) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

Cardiovascular mortality

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

Serious adverse events

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

Quality of sleep

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

All‐cause mortality

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

Time to life‐saving cardiovascular intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Pulse cyclophosphamide vs continuous cyclophosphamide

Recurrence of hyperthyroidism (relapse) [measured by serum thyroid hormone levels above the normal range after withdrawal of methimazole or end of radioiodine treatment] · adults with renal vasculitis

Pulse cyclophosphamide may leads to higher relapse at the end of compared with continuous cyclophosphamide (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review