Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,661 questions · 2,751 findings · 453 reviews

No studies found 593 · 21.6%GRADE not reported 277 · 10.1%Very low 538 · 19.6%Low 712 · 25.9%Moderate 516 · 18.8%High 115 · 4.2%

Any antimicrobial mouthwash and/or nasal spray (alone or in combination), at any concentration, delivered to the patient or HCW before and/or after an AGP vs No treatment or saline or water

Other adverse events (allergy, irritation/burning of nasal, oral or oropharyngeal mucosa, long-term staining of mucous membranes or teeth, accidental ingestion) · Patients without suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection undergoing aerosol-generating procedures (AGPs), and the healthcare workers…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Antimicrobial mouthwash and/or nasal spray (alone or in combination), any concentration, frequency or dosage vs No treatment or saline or water

Other adverse events (allergy, irritation/burning of nasal, oral or oropharyngeal mucosa, long-term staining of mucous membranes or teeth, accidental ingestion) · Patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 infection

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs open abdominal retropubic suspension

Long‐term adverse effects Number of women with recurrent UTIs at > 5 years · women with urinary incontinence

Traditional suburethral sling operation showed no clear difference in long‐term adverse effects Number of women with recurrent UTIs at > 5… compared with open abdominal retropubic colposuspension (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Traditional suburethral sling operation vs a mid‐urethral sling or tape

Long‐term adverse effects Release of sling required · women with urinary incontinence

It is very uncertain whether traditional suburethral sling operation changes long‐term adverse effects Release of sling required compared with a mid‐urethral sling or tape (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral vs intra‐vaginal antifungal treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis

Clinical cure · women aged 16 and over with uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis

Oral showed no clear difference in clinical cure (long term; 2 to 12 weeks) compared with intra‐vaginal antifungal treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral vs intra‐vaginal antifungal treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis

Mycological cure · women aged 16 and over with uncomplicated vulvovaginal candidiasis

Oral probably leads to higher mycological cure (long term; 2 to 12 weeks) compared with intra‐vaginal antifungal treatment of uncomplicated vulvovaginal… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review