Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

987 questions in 78 reviews · Haematology

current versions
No studies 256 · 25.9%Ungraded 64 · 6.5%Very low 207 · 21%Low 247 · 25%Moderate 163 · 16.5%High 50 · 5.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Intervention NR
Worsening up to day 28: participants with new need for invasive mechanical ventilation or death · hospitalised adults with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)
Antiplatelet agents for the treatment of adults with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.9, 1.01]2 studies · 15266 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Improvement up to day 28: participants discharged alive · hospitalised adults with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)
Antiplatelet agents for the treatment of adults with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.96, 1.04]2 studies · 15454 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Thrombotic events at longest · hospitalised adults with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)
Antiplatelet agents for the treatment of adults with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.9 [0.8, 1.02]4 studies · 17518 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
Serious adverse events at longest · hospitalised adults with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)
Antiplatelet agents for the treatment of adults with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
Peto OR 1.57 [0.48, 5.14]1 study · 1815 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Adverse events during study treatment · hospitalised adults with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)
Antiplatelet agents for the treatment of adults with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Intervention NR
Major bleeding events at longest · hospitalised adults with COVID‐19 (moderate to severe disease)
Antiplatelet agents for the treatment of adults with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
Peto OR 1.68 [1.29, 2.19]4 studies · 17527 participantsModerate
Intervention NR
All‐cause mortality at day 45 · non‐hospitalised adults with mild COVID‐19
Antiplatelet agents for the treatment of adults with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
Peto OR 1 [0.45, 2.22]2 studies · 4209 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Admission to hospital or death up to day 45 · non‐hospitalised adults with mild COVID‐19
Antiplatelet agents for the treatment of adults with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
Peto OR 0.79 [0.57, 1.1]2 studies · 4209 participantsVery low
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin from human plasma vs saline placebo
All‐cause mortality at day 28 · individuals with moderate or severe COVID‐19
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.79 [0.43, 1.44]NRLow
RBD‐specific polyclonal F(ab') 2 fragments of equine antibodies (EpAbs) vs saline placebo
Improvement of clinical status (number of participants discharged from hospital by day 28) · individuals with moderate or severe COVID‐19
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.06 [0.96, 1.17]1 study · 241 participantsLow
RBD‐specific polyclonal F(ab') 2 fragments of equine antibodies (EpAbs) vs saline placebo
Quality of life · individuals with moderate or severe COVID‐19
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
RBD‐specific polyclonal F(ab') 2 fragments of equine antibodies (EpAbs) vs saline placebo
Adverse events of any grade (by day 28) · individuals with moderate or severe COVID‐19
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.99 [0.74, 1.31]1 study · 243 participantsLow
RBD‐specific polyclonal F(ab') 2 fragments of equine antibodies (EpAbs) vs saline placebo
Adverse events at grade 3 or 4 (by day 28) · individuals with moderate or severe COVID‐19
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
OR 43 participantsUngraded
RBD‐specific polyclonal F(ab') 2 fragments of equine antibodies (EpAbs) vs saline placebo
Serious adverse events (by day 28) · individuals with moderate or severe COVID‐19
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.67 [0.38, 1.19]1 study · 243 participantsLow
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin from human plasma vs saline placebo
Worsening of clinical status at day 28 (data only available for clinical status worsened on day 7) · individuals with moderate or severe COVID‐19
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.85 [0.58, 1.23]NRVery low
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin from human plasma vs saline placebo
Improvement of clinical status (number of people discharged from hospital, or reaching category 1 on a 7‐point ordinal scale) · individuals with moderate or severe COVID‐19
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.97, 1.08]NRModerate
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin from human plasma vs saline placebo
Quality of life · individuals with moderate or severe COVID‐19
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin from human plasma vs saline placebo
Adverse events of any grade up to 28 days (data only available for adverse events up to day 1) · individuals with moderate or severe COVID‐19
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.98 [0.81, 1.18]NRLow
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin from human plasma vs saline placebo
Adverse events at grades 3 to 4 up to 28 days · individuals with moderate or severe COVID‐19
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
RR 4.09 [1.39, 12.01]NRModerate
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin from human plasma vs saline placebo
Serious adverse events up to day 28 (data available only as a composite of serious adverse events or death up to day 28) · individuals with moderate or severe COVID‐19
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.72 [0.45, 1.14]NRLow
RBD‐specific polyclonal F(ab') 2 fragments of equine antibodies (EpAbs) vs saline placebo
All‐cause mortality (by day 28) · individuals with moderate or severe COVID‐19
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.6 [0.26, 1.37]1 study · 241 participantsLow
RBD‐specific polyclonal F(ab') 2 fragments of equine antibodies (EpAbs) vs saline placebo
Worsening of clinical status (expressed as new need for IMV, admission to ICU, or death by day 28) · individuals with moderate or severe COVID‐19
Hyperimmune immunoglobulin for people with COVID‐19 (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.67 [0.38, 1.18]1 study · 241 participantsLow
Early vs late tracheostomy
Evidence from RCTs · hospitalized, mechanically ventilated adults with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill COVID‐19 patients (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Early vs late tracheostomy
Mortality · hospitalized, mechanically ventilated adults with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill COVID‐19 patients (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Early vs late tracheostomy
Overall mortality · hospitalized, mechanically ventilated adults with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill COVID‐19 patients (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.82 [0.52, 1.29]1 study · 150 participantsLow
Early vs late tracheostomy
Duration to liberation from mechanical ventilation · hospitalized, mechanically ventilated adults with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill COVID‐19 patients (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 150 participantsLow
Early vs late tracheostomy
Adverse events (any grade) · hospitalized, mechanically ventilated adults with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill COVID‐19 patients (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.94 [0.79, 1.13]1 study · 150 participantsLow
Early vs late tracheostomy
Ventilator‐associated pneumonia · hospitalized, mechanically ventilated adults with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill COVID‐19 patients (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.08 [0.23, 5.2]1 study · 150 participantsLow
Early vs late tracheostomy
Need for renal replacement therapy · hospitalized, mechanically ventilated adults with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill COVID‐19 patients (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Early vs late tracheostomy
ICU length of stay · hospitalized, mechanically ventilated adults with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill COVID‐19 patients (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 150 participantsLow
Early vs late tracheostomy
Evidence from NRSIs · hospitalized, mechanically ventilated adults with confirmed SARS‐CoV‐2 infection
Early versus late tracheostomy in critically ill COVID‐19 patients (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ESA with or without iron vs no treatment
On‐study mortality3 (Subnet based on 55 studies including 15,074 participants) · patients at any age with solid cancer or haematological malignancy
Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis‐ stimulating agents (ESA)… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.13 [0.01, 2.29]NRLow
IV or oral iron alone vs no treatment
Red blood cell transfusions (Subnet based on 69 studies including 18,684 participants) · patients at any age with solid cancer or haematological malignancy
Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis‐ stimulating agents (ESA)… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.74 [0.43, 1.28]NRLow
IV or oral iron alone vs no treatment
Overall mortality4 (Subnet based on 71 studies including 21,576 participants) · patients at any age with solid cancer or haematological malignancy
Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis‐ stimulating agents (ESA)… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.5 [0.63, 3.56]NRLow
IV or oral iron alone vs no treatment
Thromboembolic events5 (Subnet based on 50 studies including 15,408 participants) · patients at any age with solid cancer or haematological malignancy
Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis‐ stimulating agents (ESA)… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
IV or oral iron alone vs no treatment
Thrombocytopenia or haemorrhage5 (Subnet based on 13 studies including 2744 participants) · patients at any age with solid cancer or haematological malignancy
Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis‐ stimulating agents (ESA)… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
IV or oral iron alone vs no treatment
Hypertension5 (Subnet based on 24 studies including 8383 participants) · patients at any age with solid cancer or haematological malignancy
Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis‐ stimulating agents (ESA)… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ESA with or without iron vs no treatment
Haemoglobin response (Subnet based on 31 studies including 6985 participants) · patients at any age with solid cancer or haematological malignancy
Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis‐ stimulating agents (ESA)… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 6.71 [4.93, 9.14]NRModerate
ESA with or without iron vs no treatment
Red blood cell transfusions (Subnet based on 69 studies including 18,684 participants) · patients at any age with solid cancer or haematological malignancy
Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis‐ stimulating agents (ESA)… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.44 [0.31, 0.63]NRModerate
ESA with or without iron vs no treatment
Overall mortality4 (Subnet based on 71 studies including 21,576 participants) · patients at any age with solid cancer or haematological malignancy
Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis‐ stimulating agents (ESA)… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.46 [0.87, 2.43]NRLow
ESA with or without iron vs no treatment
Thromboembolic events5 (Subnet based on 50 studies including 15,408 participants) · patients at any age with solid cancer or haematological malignancy
Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis‐ stimulating agents (ESA)… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.82 [0.98, 3.41]NRModerate
ESA with or without iron vs no treatment
Thrombocytopenia or haemorrhage5 (Subnet based on 13 studies including 2744 participants) · patients at any age with solid cancer or haematological malignancy
Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis‐ stimulating agents (ESA)… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
ESA with or without iron vs no treatment
Hypertension5 (Subnet based on 24 studies including 8383 participants) · patients at any age with solid cancer or haematological malignancy
Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis‐ stimulating agents (ESA)… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
IV or oral iron alone vs no treatment
On‐study mortality3 (Subnet based on 55 studies including 15,074 participants) · patients at any age with solid cancer or haematological malignancy
Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis‐ stimulating agents (ESA)… (2022) · Cochrane
RR 2.95 [0.71, 12.34]NRLow
IV or oral iron alone vs no treatment
Haemoglobin response (Subnet based on 31 studies including 6985 participants) · patients at any age with solid cancer or haematological malignancy
Intravenous iron versus oral iron versus no iron with or without erythropoiesis‐ stimulating agents (ESA)… (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Tixagevimab/cilgavimab vs placebo
Infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 within 6 months · SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
SARS‐CoV‐2‐neutralising monoclonal antibodies to prevent COVID‐19 (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.45 [0.29, 0.7]1 study · 4685 participantsModerate
Casirivimab/imdevimab vs placebo
Infection with SARS‐CoV‐2 within 6 monthsa · SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
SARS‐CoV‐2‐neutralising monoclonal antibodies to prevent COVID‐19 (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.01 [0, 0.14]1 study · 825 participantsLow
Casirivimab/imdevimab vs placebo
Development of clinical COVID‐19 symptoms within 6 months · SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
SARS‐CoV‐2‐neutralising monoclonal antibodies to prevent COVID‐19 (2022) · Cochrane
RR 0.02 [0, 0.27]1 study · 969 participantsLow
Casirivimab/imdevimab vs placebo
All‐cause mortality within 6 months · SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
SARS‐CoV‐2‐neutralising monoclonal antibodies to prevent COVID‐19 (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 969 participantsVery low
Casirivimab/imdevimab vs placebo
Admission to hospital within 6 months · SARS‐CoV‐2 uninfected people without defined exposure, or with potential exposure to SARS‐CoV‐2
SARS‐CoV‐2‐neutralising monoclonal antibodies to prevent COVID‐19 (2022) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies