Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

664 questions in 25 reviews · Endodontics and dental trauma

current versions
No studies 111 · 16.7%Ungraded 417 · 62.8%Very low 69 · 10.4%Low 50 · 7.5%Moderate 16 · 2.4%High 1 · 0.2%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Tooth location
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Cheung et al. 2005 maxillary anterior
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 30.21 studyUngraded
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)
Clinical and radiographic success (composite) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth of mixed/unspecified root maturation · ≥6 months; follow-up range 1-2 years, Root maturation: mixed
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
OR 1.11 [0.17, 7.11]3 studies · 257 participantsVery low
Biodentine vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)
Tooth discoloration · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing DPC or pulpotomy · ≥6 months follow-up
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
Tooth discoloration was recorded in 4 trials; the 3 Biodentine-vs-MTA trials consistently showed more discoloration with MTA (Awawdeh 2018: 27/35 MTA vs 0/34 BD; Parinyaprom 2018: 11/31 MTA vs 0/29 BD; Uesrichai 2019:…3 studiesUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Clinical and radiographic success · Patients with carious pulp exposure in immature permanent teeth · 1 to 2 years, Immature teeth
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
OR 2.22 [0.13, 36.67]2 studies · 106 participantsVery low
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Periapical pathosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · >5-10 years, Follow-up >5-10 years
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 3.88 [1.95, 6.45]1864 participantsUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 5.02 [3.70, 6.52]37 studies · 11615 participantsLow
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Treated by general practitioners
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 4.44 [2.16, 7.49]2113 participantsUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Single-unit restorations
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 5.46 [3.63, 7.64]20 studies · 5491 participantsUngraded
Indirect restoration placement by undergraduate students vs None
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · General practitioners
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 4.44 [2.16, 7.49]2113 participantsUngraded
Eugenol-based temporary cement vs Eugenol-free temporary cement
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Eugenol-free
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 5.77 [3.72, 8.24]639 participantsUngraded
Indirect restorations vs Follow-up duration
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · > 5–10 years, > 5–10 years
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 5.53 [3.74, 7.64]2443 participantsUngraded
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)
Clinical and radiographic success (composite) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing pulpotomy (partial or full) · ≥6 months; follow-up range 1-2 years, Treatment performed: pulpotomy (FP/PP)
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
OR 2.36 [0.47, 11.75]6 studies · 341 participantsLow
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Biodentine
Clinical and radiographic success (composite) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing DPC or pulpotomy · ≥6 months follow-up
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
CH vs Biodentine was investigated in 2 RCTs for the primary outcome; not pooled. Biodentine appeared to perform better than CH (and than Theracal) in the per-trial forest plots (Figure 8). Weak evidence.2 studiesUngraded
Polyether impression material vs Polyvinyl siloxane impression material
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Polyether
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 4.02 [2.47, 5.92]2985 participantsUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Clinical and radiographic success · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth · 1 to 3 years, Unadjusted; all treatment modalities and root maturities
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
OR 2.94 [1.93, 4.49]10 studies · 900 participantsLow
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)
Clinical and radiographic success (composite) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in mature permanent teeth · ≥6 months; follow-up range 1-3 years, Root maturation: mature
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
OR 3.34 [1.81, 6.17]5 studies · 537 participantsModerate
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Periapical pathosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · >10 years, Follow-up >10 years
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 4.05 [0.89, 9.36]2656 participantsUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Clinical and radiographic success · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing direct pulp capping · 1 to 3 years, Direct pulp capping
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
OR 3.10 [1.66, 5.79]4 studies · 559 participantsModerate
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Zinc phosphate permanent cement
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 4.92 [3.85, 6.20]1387 participantsUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Polyether impression material
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 4.02 [2.47, 5.92]2985 participantsUngraded
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)
Clinical and radiographic success (composite) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing DPC or pulpotomy (all treatment types and… · ≥6 months; follow-up range 1-3 years, Unadjusted (all CH vs MTA studies)
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
OR 2.94 [1.93, 4.49]10 studies · 900 participantsLow
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Ceramic fabrication material
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 5.59 [2.89, 9.12]460 participantsUngraded
Pre-operative bone level < 35% vs Pre-operative bone level ≥ 35%
Periapical pathosis incidence · Vital teeth · Bone level ≥ 35%
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 01 studyUngraded
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)
Continued root formation / root development · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth (predominantly immature) undergoing DPC or pulpotomy · ≥6 months follow-up
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
CH vs MTA was the only informative comparison for root development (3 RCTs); estimates had implausibly wide 95% CIs, all including no difference, and two trials gave contradictory results (Qudeimat 2007 favored CH, OR…3 studiesUngraded
Polyether impression material vs Polyvinyl siloxane impression material
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Polyvinyl siloxane
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 3.17 [1.55, 5.34]636 participantsUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Periapical pathosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Fixed partial dentures (FPD)
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 4.59 [2.28, 7.64]9 studies · 2435 participantsUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Clinical and radiographic success · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth with mixed root development · 1 to 2 years, Mixed root development
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
OR 1.11 [0.17, 7.11]3 studies · 257 participantsVery low
Ceramic restoration material vs Porcelain-fused-to-metal restoration material
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Ceramic
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 5.59 [2.89, 9.12]460 participantsUngraded
Pulp-status assessment method
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Radiographic
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 4.95 [2.43, 8.29]5 studies · 1853 participantsUngraded
Indirect restorations vs Follow-up duration
Periapical pathosis incidence · Vital teeth · > 5–10 years, > 5–10 years
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 3.88 [1.95, 6.45]1864 participantsUngraded
Zinc polycarboxylate permanent cement
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Zinc polycarboxylate
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 1.11 studyUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Periapical pathosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 3.63 [2.05, 5.63]15 studies · 5376 participantsLow
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Subjective pulp-status assessment
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 3.91 [1.86, 6.66]3181 participantsUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Eugenol-free temporary cement
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 5.77 [3.72, 8.24]639 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Pulp necrosis · Compound impression material
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 3.271 studyUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Periapical pathosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · ≤5 years, Follow-up ≤5 years
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 2.26 [0.59, 4.98]856 participantsUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Treated by undergraduate students
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 5.68 [3.17, 8.86]1604 participantsUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Periapical pathosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Single-unit restorations
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 2.20 [1.12, 3.61]6 studies · 2339 participantsUngraded
Biodentine vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)
Clinical and radiographic success (composite) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing DPC or pulpotomy · ≥6 months follow-up
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
Biodentine vs MTA was the second most frequent comparison (5 RCTs) for the primary outcome but was not pooled owing to substantial clinical/statistical heterogeneity; the panel of per-trial forest plots (Figure 8)…5 studiesUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Glass ionomer (GIC) permanent cement
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 5.33 [2.56, 9.03]182 participantsUngraded
Tooth location
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Cheung et al. 2005 maxillary posterior
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 23.71 studyUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Clinical and radiographic success · Patients with carious pulp exposure in mature permanent teeth · 1 to 3 years, Mature teeth
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
OR 3.34 [1.81, 6.17]5 studies · 537 participantsModerate
Pulp-status assessment method
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Objective
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 5.66 [3.71, 7.99]24 studies · 6581 participantsUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Objective pulp-status assessment
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 5.66 [3.71, 7.99]6581 participantsUngraded
Tooth location
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Kontakiotis et al. 2015 mandibular anterior
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 11.81 studyUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Fixed partial dentures (FPD)
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 5.01 [2.76, 7.88]15 studies · 4674 participantsUngraded
Tooth location
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Kontakiotis et al. 2015 maxillary posterior
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 7.51 studyUngraded
Indirect restorations vs None
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · ≤ 5 years, ≤ 5 years
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 3.53 [2.10, 5.31]5532 participantsLow
Selective caries removal with composite resin vs Complete caries removal with composite resin
Restoration failure · Children with carious primary teeth after vital or non-vital pulp therapy · 2 to 3 years
Clinical effectiveness of restorative materials for the restoration of carious lesions in pulp treated… (2022)
Relative probability of failure 3.441 study · 48 participantsUngraded
Single-visit root canal treatment vs Multiple-visit root canal treatment (two or more visits)
Post-treatment pain within 1 week (from first session) · People aged 10 years or above requiring root canal treatment; permanent teeth with completely formed apex and without… · Within 1 week of treatment (from first session)
Single versus multiple visits for endodontic treatment of permanent teeth (2022) · Cochrane
RR 1.55 [1.14, 2.09]5 studies · 638 participantsModerate