Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

664 questions in 25 reviews · Endodontics and dental trauma

current versions
No studies 111 · 16.7%Ungraded 417 · 62.8%Very low 69 · 10.4%Low 50 · 7.5%Moderate 16 · 2.4%High 1 · 0.2%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Partial pulpotomy vs Full (complete) pulpotomy
Patient- and clinical-reported outcomes (tooth survival, clinical/radiographic success, pain) · Asymptomatic permanent teeth with deep caries (no symptoms)
The effectiveness of partial pulpotomy compared with full pulpotomy in managing deep caries in vital… (2025)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Intervention NR
Clinical and radiographic success rate · Full meta-regression: preoperative diagnosis
Partial pulpotomy for carious pulp exposure in adult mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2025)
Meta-regression No significant associationNRUngraded
Full pulpotomy vs Partial pulpotomy
Clinical and radiographic success rate · Adults aged 18 years or older with mature permanent teeth and carious pulp exposure · 1 year, Irreversible pulpitis
Partial pulpotomy for carious pulp exposure in adult mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2025)
Log odds ratio (LogOR) -0.77 [-1.62, 0.09]3 studies · 204 participantsUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CaOH)
Postoperative pain (patient-reported) · Vital permanent teeth (mature or immature) with deep or extremely deep caries and asymptomatic pulp or reversible… · 6 hours to 7 days
Effectiveness of calcium hydroxide compared to hydraulic calcium silicate cements for direct pulp capping in… (2025)
Two studies assessed postoperative pain; no meta-analysis was performed due to methodological heterogeneity. Suhag 2019: significantly higher pain in CaOH than MTA at 18 h (CaOH 18.5 +/- 20.8 mm vs MTA 6.3 +/- 9.5 mm,…2 studiesUngraded
Hydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSC; MTA or Biodentine) vs Calcium hydroxide (CaOH)
Clinical and radiographic success · Vital permanent teeth (mature or immature) with deep or extremely deep caries and asymptomatic pulp or reversible… · 36 months, 36-month follow-up
Effectiveness of calcium hydroxide compared to hydraulic calcium silicate cements for direct pulp capping in… (2025)
OR 2.34 [1.43, 3.84]2 studies · 379 participantsUngraded
Partial pulpotomy with permanent restoration after 7-14 days vs No comparator
Clinical and radiographic success rate · Adults aged 18 years or older with mature permanent teeth and carious pulp exposure · Permanent restoration after 7-14 days
Partial pulpotomy for carious pulp exposure in adult mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2025)
Success rate (%) 73.6 [66.5, 80.7]NRUngraded
Partial pulpotomy with tri-calcium silicate material (MTA or Biodentine) vs No comparator
Clinical and radiographic success rate · Adults aged 18 years or older with mature permanent teeth and carious pulp exposure · At least 1 year, MTA or Biodentine
Partial pulpotomy for carious pulp exposure in adult mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2025)
Success rate (%) 86.8 [83.78, 89.82]NRUngraded
Partial pulpotomy with one additional day before permanent restoration vs Partial pulpotomy with one fewer day before permanent restoration
Clinical and radiographic success rate · Adults aged 18 years or older with mature permanent teeth and carious pulp exposure · Per day of restoration delay, Meta-regression
Partial pulpotomy for carious pulp exposure in adult mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2025)
Meta-regression coefficient (per day, proportion scale) -0.088NRUngraded
Biodentine (BD) vs Calcium hydroxide (CaOH)
Clinical and radiographic success · Vital permanent teeth (mature or immature) with deep or extremely deep caries and asymptomatic pulp or reversible… · >=12 months
Effectiveness of calcium hydroxide compared to hydraulic calcium silicate cements for direct pulp capping in… (2025)
OR 3.14 [0.91, 10.86]3 studies · 242 participantsUngraded
Hydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSC; MTA or Biodentine) vs Calcium hydroxide (CaOH)
Clinical and radiographic success · Vital permanent teeth (mature or immature) with deep or extremely deep caries and asymptomatic pulp or reversible… · 12 months, 12-month follow-up
Effectiveness of calcium hydroxide compared to hydraulic calcium silicate cements for direct pulp capping in… (2025)
OR 4.44 [1.63, 12.07]3 studies · 174 participantsUngraded
Partial pulpotomy with permanent restoration after more than 14 days vs No comparator
Clinical and radiographic success rate · Adults aged 18 years or older with mature permanent teeth and carious pulp exposure · Permanent restoration after more than 14 days
Partial pulpotomy for carious pulp exposure in adult mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2025)
Success rate (%) 23.2 [13.4, 33.0]NRUngraded
Partial pulpotomy with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) hemostatic agent vs Partial pulpotomy without NaOCl / alternative hemostatic agent
Clinical and radiographic success rate · Adults (>=18 y) with mature permanent teeth and deep carious pulp exposure · >=1 year, Hemostatic agent (NaOCl use and concentration)
Partial pulpotomy for carious pulp exposure in adult mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2025)
Meta-regression across included studies: NaOCl concentration did not significantly affect success when a tri-calcium silicate capping material was used; the use of NaOCl itself showed borderline significance (higher…NRUngraded
Intervention NR
Tooth survival · -
The effectiveness of partial pulpotomy compared with full pulpotomy in managing deep caries in vital… (2025)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Partial pulpotomy with calcium hydroxide vs No comparator
Clinical and radiographic success rate · Adults aged 18 years or older with mature permanent teeth and carious pulp exposure · At least 1 year, Calcium hydroxide
Partial pulpotomy for carious pulp exposure in adult mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2025)
Success rate (%) 34.3 [24.93, 43.67]NRUngraded
Partial pulpotomy vs Full (complete) pulpotomy
Postoperative analgesic use · Mature permanent (molar) teeth with deep caries and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis (spontaneous pain) · Postoperative (up to 1 week)
The effectiveness of partial pulpotomy compared with full pulpotomy in managing deep caries in vital… (2025)
Analgesic use recorded in both studies. Jassal: PP 12% vs FP 8%. In one study, significantly fewer patients required analgesics with complete/full pulpotomy (30.6%) than partial pulpotomy (54.5%), and mean analgesic…2 studies · 156 participantsUngraded
Partial pulpotomy with one-unit longer follow-up vs Partial pulpotomy with one-unit shorter follow-up
Clinical and radiographic success rate · Adults aged 18 years or older with mature permanent teeth and carious pulp exposure · Per unit increase in follow-up time, Sensitivity analysis excluding studies with high risk of bias
Partial pulpotomy for carious pulp exposure in adult mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2025)
Meta-regression coefficient -0.36NRUngraded
Restricted partial pulpotomy (pulp removal 2-3 mm from exposure site only) vs Extended partial pulpotomy (pulp removal 2-3 mm from entire pulp chamber with complete deroofing)
Clinical and radiographic success rate · Adults (18-45 y) with mature permanent molars, carious exposure and symptomatic irreversible pulpitis · 1 year, Lateral extent of pulp amputation
Partial pulpotomy for carious pulp exposure in adult mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2025)
Success rate (%) 97.6 vs 97.51 study · 96 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Clinical and radiographic success rate · Full meta-regression: follow-up duration
Partial pulpotomy for carious pulp exposure in adult mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2025)
Meta-regression No significant associationNRUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CaOH)
Clinical and radiographic success · Vital permanent teeth (mature or immature) with deep or extremely deep caries and asymptomatic pulp or reversible… · >=12 months
Effectiveness of calcium hydroxide compared to hydraulic calcium silicate cements for direct pulp capping in… (2025)
OR 3.05 [1.70, 5.45]4 studies · 311 participantsUngraded
Partial pulpotomy vs Full (complete) pulpotomy
Radiographic hard-tissue (dentine) barrier formation · Mature permanent (molar) teeth with deep caries and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis (spontaneous pain) · 1 year
The effectiveness of partial pulpotomy compared with full pulpotomy in managing deep caries in vital… (2025)
Ramani: radiographic hard-tissue barrier formation evident in 24.4% of full pulpotomy cases vs 11.6% of partial pulpotomy cases; difference not significant (p>.05).1 study · 106 participantsUngraded
Partial pulpotomy with immediate permanent restoration vs No comparator
Clinical and radiographic success rate · Adults aged 18 years or older with mature permanent teeth and carious pulp exposure · Immediate restoration
Partial pulpotomy for carious pulp exposure in adult mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2025)
Success rate (%) 89.9 [78.5, 99.8]NRUngraded
Partial pulpotomy vs Full (complete) pulpotomy
Pulp sensibility (EPT/cold response) · Mature permanent (molar) teeth with deep caries and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis (spontaneous pain) · 1 year
The effectiveness of partial pulpotomy compared with full pulpotomy in managing deep caries in vital… (2025)
Jassal: positive pulp sensibility at 1 year - EPT positive in PP 95.45% (21/22) vs FP 63.6% (14/22); cold test positive in PP 45.45% (10/22) vs FP 13.63% (3/22). Sensibility was not used to ascertain the success…1 study · 44 participantsUngraded
Hydraulic calcium silicate cements (HCSC; MTA or Biodentine) vs Calcium hydroxide (CaOH)
Clinical and radiographic success · Vital permanent teeth (mature or immature) with deep or extremely deep caries and asymptomatic pulp or reversible… · >=12 months
Effectiveness of calcium hydroxide compared to hydraulic calcium silicate cements for direct pulp capping in… (2025)
OR 2.68 [1.7, 4.22]5 studies · 552 participantsModerate
Restricted partial pulpotomy (pulp removal 2-3 mm from exposure site only) vs Extended partial pulpotomy (pulp removal 2-3 mm from entire pulp chamber with complete deroofing)
Postoperative pain and analgesic intake · Adults (18-45 y) with mature permanent molars, carious exposure and symptomatic irreversible pulpitis · Postoperative days 1-2, Lateral extent of pulp amputation
Partial pulpotomy for carious pulp exposure in adult mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2025)
Same RCT (Ramani 2024): restricted PP had significantly lower postoperative pain scores on days 1 and 2 (p<0.05) and required significantly less analgesic intake (p<0.05) than extended PP.1 study · 96 participantsUngraded
Partial pulpotomy vs Full (complete) pulpotomy
Oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) · Mature permanent (molar) teeth with deep caries and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis (spontaneous pain) · >=6 months
The effectiveness of partial pulpotomy compared with full pulpotomy in managing deep caries in vital… (2025)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Partial pulpotomy (PP) with calcium hydroxide vs Direct pulp capping (DPC) with calcium hydroxide
Clinical and radiographic success rate · Adults (>=18 y) with mature permanent teeth, carious exposure and normal/reversibly inflamed pulp · 1 year
Partial pulpotomy for carious pulp exposure in adult mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2025)
Success rate (%) 34.5 vs 31.81 study · 51 participantsUngraded
Partial pulpotomy (PP) with calcium hydroxide vs Direct pulp capping (DPC) with calcium hydroxide
Clinical and radiographic success rate · Adults (>=18 y) with mature permanent teeth, carious exposure and normal/reversibly inflamed pulp · 5 years
Partial pulpotomy for carious pulp exposure in adult mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2025)
Success rate (%) 11.1 vs 5.91 study · 44 participantsUngraded
Partial pulpotomy vs Full (complete) pulpotomy
Postoperative pain (VAS) · Mature permanent (molar) teeth with deep caries and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis (spontaneous pain) · 24 h to 7 days
The effectiveness of partial pulpotomy compared with full pulpotomy in managing deep caries in vital… (2025)
Jassal: no significant difference in postoperative pain between PP and FP at 24 h, 48 h and 7 days (preoperative PP 7.44+/-0.96 vs FP 7.52+/-1.08, p>.879). Ramani: no difference in pain incidence at 24 h (p=.496) but…2 studies · 156 participantsUngraded
Partial pulpotomy with tri-calcium silicate material (MTA or Biodentine) vs Partial pulpotomy with calcium hydroxide (CH)
Clinical and radiographic success rate · Adults (>=18 y) with mature permanent teeth and carious pulp exposure (irreversible pulpitis or normal/reversible) · >=1 year (subgroups at 1, 2, 5 years), Capping material (tri-calcium silicate vs calcium hydroxide)
Partial pulpotomy for carious pulp exposure in adult mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2025)
MD 52.5NRUngraded
Partial pulpotomy with immediate (same-visit) permanent restoration vs Partial pulpotomy with delayed permanent restoration (7-14 days or >14 days)
Clinical and radiographic success rate · Adults (>=18 y) with mature permanent teeth and deep carious pulp exposure · >=1 year, Timing of permanent restoration: immediate vs >14 days
Partial pulpotomy for carious pulp exposure in adult mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2025)
MD 66.7NRUngraded
Partial pulpotomy with tri-calcium silicate material vs Partial pulpotomy with calcium hydroxide
Clinical and radiographic success rate · Adults aged 18 years or older with mature permanent teeth and carious pulp exposure · Meta-regression
Partial pulpotomy for carious pulp exposure in adult mature permanent teeth: a systematic review and… (2025)
Meta-regression effect (%) 37NRUngraded
Partial pulpotomy vs Full (complete) pulpotomy
Clinical and radiographic success (composite) · Mature permanent (molar) teeth with deep caries and symptoms indicative of irreversible pulpitis (spontaneous pain) · 1 year (12 months)
The effectiveness of partial pulpotomy compared with full pulpotomy in managing deep caries in vital… (2025)
FP 90%, PP 83% (pooled unadjusted 1-year success; no significant difference; no meta-analysis)2 studies · 135 participantsHigh
Partial pulpotomy vs Full (complete) pulpotomy
Patient- and clinical-reported outcomes (tooth survival, clinical/radiographic success, pain) · Permanent teeth with deep caries and reversible pulpitis (non-spontaneous pain)
The effectiveness of partial pulpotomy compared with full pulpotomy in managing deep caries in vital… (2025)
no estimate extracted0 studiesNo studies
Intervention NR
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Mature teeth, irreversible pulpitis
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.798 [0.712, 0.873]10 studiesUngraded
Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs None (single-arm success proportion)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months, Hemostasis <=6 min
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.904NRUngraded
Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs None (single-arm success proportion)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months, Hemostasis unknown
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.802NRUngraded
Intervention NR
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Immature teeth, unspecified/mixed diagnosis
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.888 [0.816, 0.945]6 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Partial pulpotomy, normal pulp/reversible pulpitis
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.920 [0.879, 0.954]4 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Partial pulpotomy, immature teeth
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.924 [0.851, 0.976]3 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Immature teeth, irreversible pulpitis
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.790 [0.667, 0.892]2 studiesUngraded
Biodentine vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
OR 6.03 [0.97, 37.6]2 studiesUngraded
Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs None (single-arm success proportion)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months, Normal pulp/reversible pulpitis
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.920 [0.879, 0.954]NRUngraded
Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs None (single-arm success proportion)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · 12 months, 12-month follow-up
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.856NRUngraded
Full pulpotomy vs Partial pulpotomy
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Mature permanent teeth with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis and carious pulp exposure · >=12 months
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
OR 2.16 [0.92, 5.07]3 studiesUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months, Partial pulpotomy
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
OR 2.81 [1.38, 5.74]NRUngraded
Intervention NR
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Partial pulpotomy, mature teeth
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.842 [0.745, 0.921]6 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Full pulpotomy, immature teeth
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.844 [0.748, 0.921]7 studiesUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months, Mature teeth
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
OR 2.63 [1.14, 6.03]NRUngraded
Intervention NR
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Full pulpotomy, mature teeth
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.846 [0.739, 0.930]9 studiesUngraded
Intervention NR
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Mature teeth, partial pulpotomy, irreversible pulpitis
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.808 [0.723, 0.881]5 studiesUngraded