Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

300 questions · 325 findings · 28 reviews · Effective Practice and Organisation of Care

No studies found 84 · 25.8%GRADE not reported 6 · 1.8%Very low 115 · 35.4%Low 70 · 21.5%Moderate 45 · 13.8%High 5 · 1.5%

Mobile technologies used by primary care providers to consult with a hospital‐based specialist vs usual care

Providers' adherence to recommended practice, guidelines or protocols: Adherence to the advised monitoring criteria · Primary care providers consulting with dermatologists (6 studies), ophthalmologists (2 studies), radiologists (1 study), nephrologists (1…
1 finding from 1 review

Mobile technologies used by primary care providers to consult with a hospital‐based specialist vs usual care

Time between presentation and management of the health condition · Primary care providers consulting with dermatologists (6 studies), ophthalmologists (2 studies), radiologists (1 study), nephrologists (1…
1 finding from 1 review

Mobile technologies used by primary care providers to consult with a hospital‐based specialist vs usual care

Participants' health status and well‐being · Primary care providers consulting with dermatologists (6 studies), ophthalmologists (2 studies), radiologists (1 study), nephrologists (1…
1 finding from 1 review

Mobile technologies used by primary care providers to consult with a hospital‐based specialist vs usual care

Patient satisfaction and acceptability · Primary care providers consulting with dermatologists (6 studies), ophthalmologists (2 studies), radiologists (1 study), nephrologists (1…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Effects of practice‐based interprofessional collaboration (IPC) interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes vs usual care

Patient health outcomes · health and social care professionals involved in the delivery of health services and patient care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Effects of practice‐based interprofessional collaboration (IPC) interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes vs usual care

Patient mortality, morbidity or complication rates · health and social care professionals involved in the delivery of health services and patient care

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Effects of practice‐based interprofessional collaboration (IPC) interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes vs usual care

Providers' adherence to recommended practice, guidelines or protocols · health and social care professionals involved in the delivery of health services and patient care
1 finding from 1 review

Effects of practice‐based interprofessional collaboration (IPC) interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes vs usual care

Collaborative working; team communication; team co‐ordination · health and social care professionals involved in the delivery of health services and patient care
1 finding from 1 review

Case management for integrated care vs usual care of older people living with frailty

All‐cause mortality · people aged 65 years and older living with frailty

Case management for integrated care showed no clear difference in mortality compared with usual care of older people living with frailty (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Case management for integrated care vs usual care of older people living with frailty

Change in place of residence to a nursing or residential home · people aged 65 years and older living with frailty

Case management for integrated care showed no clear difference in change in place of residence to a nursing or residential home compared with usual care of older people living with frailty (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Primary‐level worker‐led collaborative care vs usual care

CMD symptoms ‐ intermediate term (1 to 6 months post intervention) Measured by change in CIS‐Rg; GHQ‐12i; HDRSc; PHQ‐9e,j,k scores from baseline (greater decline = greater improvement) · adults with common mental disorders
1 finding from 1 review