Question · asked by 1 review
Mobile technologies used by primary care providers to consult with a hospital‐based specialist vs usual care: Costs
- Population
- Primary care providers consulting with dermatologists (6 studies), ophthalmologists (2 studies), radiologists (1 study), nephrologists (1 study), or different specialists (1 study)
- Intervention
- Mobile technologies used by primary care providers to consult with a hospital‐based specialist
- Comparison
- usual care
- Outcome
- Costs
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Mobile technologies used by primary care providers to consult with a hospital‐based specialist vs usual care Costs · Primary care providers consulting with dermatologists (6 studies), ophthalmologists (2 studies), radiologists (1… Mobile technologies to support healthcare provider to healthcare provider communication and management of care (2020) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | 5423 participants | Low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mobile technologies to support healthcare provider to healthcare provider communication and management of care 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.