Percutaneous ethanol injection vs no intervention, other ablation methods, or systemic treatment
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes recurrence compared with steroid injection (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes adverse events (infection, partial loss of movement, tendon or −0… compared with steroid injection (very low certainty).
Percutaneous surgery showed no clear difference in neurovascular injury compared with steroid injection (low certainty).
Percutaneous surgery showed no clear difference in resolution of symptoms compared with open surgery (low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes recurrence compared with open surgery (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes adverse events (infection, partial loss of movement, tendon or… compared with open surgery (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether percutaneous surgery changes resolution of symptoms (after 1 or more injections) compared with steroid injection (very low certainty).
Percutaneous vascular interventions showed no clear difference in good functional outcome (mRS score 0‐2) compared with intravenous thrombolytic treatment (low certainty).
Percutaneous vascular interventions showed no clear difference in death compared with intravenous thrombolytic treatment (low certainty).
Percutaneous vascular interventions showed no clear difference in symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage within first 14 days compared with intravenous thrombolytic treatment (low certainty).