Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

300 questions · 309 findings · 40 reviews

No studies found 46 · 14.9%GRADE not reported 6 · 1.9%Very low 97 · 31.4%Low 83 · 26.9%Moderate 57 · 18.4%High 20 · 6.5%

Percutaneous vs open surgical PD catheter insertion

Early PD catheter function (within 4 weeks of PD catheter insertion) · improving catheter function and clinical outcomes in PD patients

It is very uncertain whether percutaneous changes early PD catheter function (within 4 weeks of PD catheter insertion) compared with open surgical PD catheter insertion (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Percutaneous vs open surgical PD catheter insertion

Dialysate leakage · improving catheter function and clinical outcomes in PD patients

It is very uncertain whether percutaneous changes dialysate leakage compared with open surgical PD catheter insertion (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Percutaneous vs open surgical PD catheter insertion

Dependability/reliability (mechanical failure) · improving catheter function and clinical outcomes in PD patients

It is very uncertain whether percutaneous changes mechanical failure compared with open surgical PD catheter insertion (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Totally percutaneous vs cut‐down femoral artery access

Short‐term mortality (30‐day or in‐hospital) · people undergoing elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair

Totally percutaneous showed no clear difference in short‐term mortality (30‐day or in‐hospital) compared with cut‐down femoral artery access (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Totally percutaneous vs cut‐down femoral artery access

Failure of aneurysm exclusion ( · people undergoing elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair

Totally percutaneous showed no clear difference in failure of aneurysm exclusion( compared with cut‐down femoral artery access (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Totally percutaneous vs cut‐down femoral artery access

Wound infection · people undergoing elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair

Totally percutaneous showed no clear difference in wound infection (30‐day or in‐hospital) compared with cut‐down femoral artery access (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Totally percutaneous vs cut‐down femoral artery access

Major complications · people undergoing elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair

Totally percutaneous showed no clear difference in major complications (30‐day or in‐hospital) compared with cut‐down femoral artery access (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Totally percutaneous vs cut‐down femoral artery access

Medium‐ to long‐term complications( · people undergoing elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair

Totally percutaneous showed no clear difference in medium‐ to long‐term complications( compared with cut‐down femoral artery access (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Totally percutaneous vs cut‐down femoral artery access

Bleeding complications (30‐day or in‐hospital) · people undergoing elective bifurcated abdominal endovascular aneurysm repair

Totally percutaneous showed no clear difference in bleeding complications (30‐day or in‐hospital) compared with cut‐down femoral artery access (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy vs tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotripsy

Serious adverse events or complications of treatments

It is very uncertain whether percutaneous nephrolithotripsy changes serious adverse events or complications of treatments compared with tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review