Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

65 questions · 87 findings · 7 reviews · Airways

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 31 · 35.6%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 16 · 18.4%Low 27 · 31%Moderate 10 · 11.5%High 3 · 3.4%

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care alone or inactive control

Serious adverse events

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care alone or inactive control

Quality of sleep

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care alone or inactive control

Quality of life ‐ after 48 months Number of participants: 1325(1 RCT)

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care alone or inactive control

AHI

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care alone or inactive control

All‐cause mortality ‐ up to 80 months Number of participants: 1355(2 RCTs)

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) plus best supportive care showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality ‐ up to 80 months Number of participants: 1355(2… compared with best supportive care alone or inactive control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.56 [0.06, 4.93]
Studies not reported
Low

Adaptive servo ventilation (ASV) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care alone or inactive control

Time to life‐saving cardiovascular intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

Central AHI

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

Cardiovascular mortality

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care showed no clear difference in cardiovascular mortality ‐ after 24 months Number of participants:… compared with best supportive care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.17 [0.68, 2.02]
Studies not reported
Low

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

Serious adverse events

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

Quality of sleep

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

Quality of life

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

AHI

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

All‐cause mortality ‐ after 24 months Number of participants: 287(2 RCTs)

It is very uncertain whether continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care changes all‐cause mortality ‐ after 24 months Number of participants: 287(2… compared with best supportive care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.14 [0.83, 1.56]
Studies not reported
Very low

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care vs best supportive care

Time to life‐saving cardiovascular intervention

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) plus best supportive care may leads to lower time to life‐saving cardiovascular intervention ( compared with best supportive care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for central sleep apnoea in adults 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low

Intervention not reported

Mortality · children with acute asthma

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for acute asthma in children 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 16 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Serious adverse events · children with acute asthma

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for acute asthma in children 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 35 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Asthma symptom score at the acute phase · children with acute asthma

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for acute asthma in children 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 35 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Pneumonia · children with acute asthma

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for acute asthma in children 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 19 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Mortality · patients with asthma

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for treatment of respiratory failure due to severe acute exacerbations of… 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 86 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Endotracheal intubation · patients with asthma

The intervention showed no clear difference in endotracheal intubation (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation for treatment of respiratory failure due to severe acute exacerbations of… 2012 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 4.48 [0.23, 89.13]
2 studies · 86 participants
Low