Return to work · adults with open long bone fractures of the upper and lower limbs
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Limb function at 6 or 12 months · adults with open long bone fractures of the upper and lower limbs
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
HRQoL at 6 or 12 months · adults with open long bone fractures of the upper and lower limbs
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Functional assessment using a patient reported outcome measure: · participants undergoing rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the handa
2 findings from 1 review
Active finger range of motion · participants undergoing rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the handa
2 findings from 1 review
Adverse events: participants incurring one or more adverse events · participants undergoing rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the handa
It is very uncertain whether early active flexion plus controlled passive exercise regimen changes adverse events: participants incurring one or more adverse events compared with early controlled passive exercise regimen (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Tendon rupture · participants undergoing rehabilitation following surgery for flexor tendon injuries of the handa
It is very uncertain whether early active flexion plus controlled passive exercise regimen changes adverse event (tendon rupture) compared with early controlled passive exercise regimen (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mobilityd ‐ overall analysis Using different mobility scales: MILA (range 0 to 36), EMS (range 0 to 20), BBS (range 0 to 56), PPME (range 0 to 12), Koval (range 1 to 7). Higher values indicate better mobility (except MILA and Koval, where scale wa... · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention may leads to higher mobilityd ‐ overall analysis Using different mobility scales: MILA… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mobility scales, using EMS (range 0 to 20). Higher values indicate better mobility · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in mobility scales, using EMS (range 0 to 20). Higher values indicate… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mobilityd ‐ overall analysis Using different mobility scales: mPPT (range 0 to 36), POMA (range 0 to 30), SPPB (range 0 to 12), PPME (range 0 to 12). A higher score indicates better mobility. · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention leads to higher mobilityd ‐ overall analysis Using different mobility scales: mPPT… (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Walking speedg ‐ overall analysis Measured using metres/second (m/s) and metres/minute (m/min). A higher score indicates faster walking. · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention leads to higher walking speedg ‐ overall analysis Measured using metres/second (m/s)… (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Functioningi ‐ overall analysis Using different functioning scales: FSQ (range 0 to 36), BI (range 0 to 100), AM‐PAC daily activity (range 9 to 101), COPM (range 0 to 20), LEFS (range 0 to 80), NEADL (range 0 to 66). A higher score indicates bette... · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention leads to higher functioningi ‐ overall analysis Using different functioning scales:… (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
HRQoL using EQ‐ 5D (range 0 to 1), SF‐36 (range 0 to 100), SF‐12 (range 0 to 100), and WHOQOL‐BREF (range 0 to 130). A higher score indicates better quality of life. · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in HRQoL using EQ‐ 5D (range 0 to 1), SF‐36 (range 0 to 100), SF‐12… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mortality · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in mortality (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse event: number of people who were re‐admitted · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in adverse event: number of people who were re‐admitted (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Mobility outcome · adults following hip fracture surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Mobility scales, using different scales: SPPB (range 0 to 12), PPME (range 0 to 12). A higher score indicates better mobility. · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention leads to higher mobility scales, using different scales: SPPB (range 0 to 12), PPME… (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Walking speedg ‐ overall analysis Measured using metres/second (m/s) and metres/minute (m/min). A higher score indicates faster walking. · adults following hip fracture surgery
The intervention showed no clear difference in walking speedg ‐ overall analysis Measured using metres/second (m/s)… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Minute Walk Test · adults following hip fracture surgery
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported
Intervention not reported
Mobility scales · adults following hip fracture surgery
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
0 participants
GRADE not reported