Effervescent tablets vs no treatment
Effervescent tablets led to lower fusobacteria (colony forming units, log-transformed) compared with no treatment; GRADE not reported.
- MD -3.71 [-4.16, -3.26]1 study · 18 participantsGRADE not reported
Effervescent tablets led to lower fusobacteria (colony forming units, log-transformed) compared with no treatment; GRADE not reported.
Brushing led to lower fusobacteria (colony forming units, log-transformed) compared with no treatment; GRADE not reported.
Brushing led to higher fusobacteria (colony forming units, log-transformed) compared with effervescent tablets; GRADE not reported.
Association of brushing and effervescent tablets led to lower total anaerobes (colony forming units, log-transformed) compared with no treatment; GRADE not reported.
Association of brushing and effervescent tablets led to lower fusobacteria (colony forming units, log-transformed) compared with no treatment; GRADE not reported.
Effervescent tablets showed no clear difference in total anaerobes (colony forming units, log-transformed) compared with association of brushing and effervescent tablets; GRADE not reported.
Effervescent tablets led to lower total anaerobes (colony forming units, log-transformed) compared with no treatment; GRADE not reported.
Brushing led to higher total anaerobes (colony forming units, log-transformed) compared with effervescent tablets; GRADE not reported.
Effervescent tablets showed no clear difference in fusobacteria (colony forming units, log-transformed) compared with association of brushing and effervescent tablets; GRADE not reported.
Brushing led to higher fusobacteria (colony forming units, log-transformed) compared with association of brushing and effervescent tablets; GRADE not reported.
Brushing led to higher total anaerobes (colony forming units, log-transformed) compared with association of brushing and effervescent tablets; GRADE not reported.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
IMZ TPS titanium cylinders showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with ITI TPS solid titanium screws; GRADE not reported.
Branemark Mark II turned titanium screws showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with ITI TPS solid titanium screws; GRADE not reported.
NobelActive external connection implants showed no clear difference in marginal bone level change compared with nobelActive internal connection implants; GRADE not reported.
IMZ TPS titanium cylinders showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with ITI TPS hollow titanium screws; GRADE not reported.
Branemark turned titanium screws showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with IMZ TPS titanium cylinders; GRADE not reported.
NobelReplace Select Tapered implants showed no clear difference in implant failure compared with nobelReplace Groovy implants; GRADE not reported.