Question · asked by 1 review

Brushing vs Association of brushing and effervescent tablets: Fusobacteria (colony forming units, log-transformed)

Population
Maxillary complete denture (CD) wearers
Intervention
Brushing
Comparison
Association of brushing and effervescent tablets
Outcome
Fusobacteria (colony forming units, log-transformed)

Brushing led to higher fusobacteria (colony forming units, log-transformed) compared with association of brushing and effervescent tablets; GRADE not reported.

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Brushing vs Association of brushing and effervescent tablets
Fusobacteria (colony forming units, log-transformed) · Maxillary complete denture (CD) wearers
Brushing led to higher fusobacteria (colony forming units, log-transformed) compared with association of brushing and effervescent tablets; GRADE not reported.
Interventions for cleaning dentures in adults (2009) · Cochrane All outcomes
MD 2.86 [2.25, 3.47]1 study · 18 participantsGRADE not reported

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Interventions for cleaning dentures in adults
2009 · Cochrane All outcomes
May 2009Not listedNot assessed

The same intervention and outcome, asked in another population or against another comparator.

How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.