Staff/personnel costs; costs of treatment and care; cost of primary care; lost wages and lost productivity · patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes eligible for diabetic retinopathy screening
1 finding from 1 review
Incidence of retinopathy at 4 to 5 years · type 1 or type 2 diabetics
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 participants
GRADE not reported
Progression of retinopathy · type 1 or type 2 diabetics
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 participants
GRADE not reported
Combined incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy by 5 years · type 1 or type 2 diabetics
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 participants
GRADE not reported
Incidence of PDR/CSME/VH by 5 years · type 1 or type 2 diabetics
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 participants
GRADE not reported
Change in visual loss associated with PSR: visual loss is defined by the deterioration of visual acuity of 3 lines or more with the Snellen chart · type 1 or type 2 diabetics
It is very uncertain whether blood pressure intervention/intensive blood pressure intervention changes visual acuity (loss of 3 lines or more) by 5 years compared with placebo/standard blood pressure intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events—all‐cause mortality · type 1 or type 2 diabetics
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
1 participants
GRADE not reported
Adverse events: hypotension · type 1 or type 2 diabetics
Blood pressure intervention/intensive blood pressure intervention may leads to higher adverse events—hypotension compared with placebo/standard blood pressure intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Minor adverse events Defined as any adverse event within 8 weeks of surgery that does not require further intervention · people with intermittent exotropia, aged less than 11 years
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Minor adverse events Defined as any adverse event within 8 weeks of surgery that does not require further intervention · people with intermittent exotropia, aged 5 to 49 years
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Minor adverse events Defined as any adverse event within 8 weeks of surgery that does not require further intervention · people with intermittent exotropia, aged over 6 years
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Minor adverse events Defined as any adverse event within 8 weeks of surgery that does not require further intervention · people with intermittent exotropia, aged 3 to < 11 years
Bilateral lateral rectus recession showed no clear difference in minor adverse events Defined as any adverse event within 8 weeks of… compared with unilateral lateral rectus recession with medial rectus resection (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Comparison (intervention vs comparator) · children with myopia (nearsightedness)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of participants with intervention‐related, vision‐threatening adverse events at 1 to 4 weeks · people with dry eye
1 finding from 1 review
Proportion of participants with intervention‐related, vision‐threatening adverse events at 1 to 4 weeks · people with dry eye
1 finding from 1 review
Frequency of intervention‐related ocular adverse events ( · people with primary macula‐involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachments
1 finding from 1 review
Frequency of intervention‐related non‐ocular adverse events ( · people with primary macula‐involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachments
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Proportion of eyes with elevated IOP or receiving intervention · people with chronic non‐infectious uveitis
Steroid implant probably leads to higher proportion of eyes with elevated IOP or receiving intervention compared with standard‐of‐care therapy (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 3.64 [2.71, 4.87]
Studies not reported
Moderate
Proportion of participants with elevated IOP or receiving intervention · people with chronic non‐infectious uveitis
Steroid implant probably leads to higher proportion of participants with elevated IOP or receiving intervention compared with sham procedure (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Technical difficulties · people with any eye disease including optic nerve disease, age‐related macular degeneration, retinopathy of prematurity, retinitis…
It is very uncertain whether telerehabilitation changes technical difficulties with the intervention at 6 months compared with self‐training (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review