Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

64 questions · 68 findings · 9 reviews

No studies found 14 · 20.6%GRADE not reported 19 · 27.9%Very low 26 · 38.2%Low 6 · 8.8%Moderate 3 · 4.4%High 0 · 0%

Single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) vs Two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether) conventional method

Participant-reported quality of the denture (general satisfaction) · Completely edentulous people

It is very uncertain whether single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) changes participant-reported quality of the denture (general satisfaction,… compared with two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether)… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) vs Two stage-two step zinc-oxide eugenol (ZoE) traditional method

Oral health-related quality of life · Completely edentulous people

It is very uncertain whether single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) changes participant-reported oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-EDENT) compared with two stage-two step zinc-oxide eugenol (ZoE) traditional method (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) vs Two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether) conventional method

Mandibular denture satisfaction · Completely edentulous people

It is very uncertain whether single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) changes mandibular denture satisfaction compared with two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether)… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) vs Two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether) conventional method

Maxillary denture satisfaction · Completely edentulous people

It is very uncertain whether single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) changes maxillary denture satisfaction compared with two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether)… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) vs Two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether) conventional method

Oral health-related quality of life · Completely edentulous people

It is very uncertain whether single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) changes participant-reported oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-EDENT) compared with two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether)… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) vs Two stage-two step zinc-oxide eugenol (ZoE) traditional method

Operator-assessed quality of the denture (retention and stability) · Completely edentulous people
1 finding from 1 review

NMA evidence for individual network: proportion with complete healing ‐ interventions vs saline gauze

Sequential hydrocolloid alginate dressings · people with pressure ulcers

It is very uncertain whether NMA evidence for individual network: proportion with complete… changes sequential hydrocolloid alginate dressings compared with saline gauze (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

NMA evidence for individual network: proportion with complete healing ‐ interventions vs saline gauze

Hydrocolloid dressing with/without alginate · people with pressure ulcers

It is very uncertain whether NMA evidence for individual network: proportion with complete… changes hydrocolloid dressing with/without alginate compared with saline gauze (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hydrogel dressings vs alginate gel

Change in ulcer size · people with venous leg ulcers

It is very uncertain whether hydrogel dressings changes change in ulcer size: percent reduction in ulcer area at 4 weeks compared with alginate gel (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Dialkylcarbamoyl chloride (DACC)‐coated dressing vs alginate dressing

Proportion of wounds healed · adults with open wounds after surgery for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease

It is very uncertain whether dialkylcarbamoyl chloride (DACC)‐coated dressing changes proportion of wounds healed at 25 days compared with alginate dressing (very low certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Dialkylcarbamoyl chloride (DACC)‐coated dressing vs alginate dressing

Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · adults with open wounds after surgery for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Dialkylcarbamoyl chloride (DACC)‐coated dressing vs alginate dressing

Adverse effects (surgical site infection or allergic reaction) · adults with open wounds after surgery for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review