Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

64 questions · 64 findings · 16 reviews · Musculoskeletal

No studies found 19 · 29.7%GRADE not reported 2 · 3.1%Very low 2 · 3.1%Low 17 · 26.6%Moderate 16 · 25%High 8 · 12.5%

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs posterior stabilised sacrifice

Survival rate of the implant (Revision surgery reported) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs posterior stabilised sacrifice

Health related quality of life measures and functional measures with validated instruments (WOMAC, range 0‐100, higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs posterior stabilised sacrifice

Global Assessment (Patient) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs)

Knee pain Knee Society Score, sub score pain (possible range 0 (severe pain) ‐ 50 (no pain) points) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs posterior stabilised sacrifice

Complications · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs posterior stabilised sacrifice

Re‐operation rate (not involving implant change, short and long term) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs)

Survival rate of the implant (Revision surgery reported) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs)

Health related quality of life measures and functional measures with validated instruments (WOMAC, range 0‐100, higher scores indicate worse pain, stiffness and functional limitations) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs)

Global assessment (patient) Patient satisfaction on scale 0 (not at all satisfied) to 10 (completely satisfied) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs)

Complications · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (all types of arthroplasty designs)

Re‐operation rate (not involving implant change, short and long term) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without posterior stabilised design for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (using the same arthroplasty design)

Performance based measures ‐ Range of motion (possible range 0 (worst) to 140 (maximal) degrees) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without resection of the posterior cruciate ligament for the treatment of osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review

Posterior cruciate ligament retention vs sacrifice (using the same arthroplasty design)

Knee pain Knee Society Score, sub score pain (possible range 0 (severe pain) ‐ 50 (no pain) points) · Patients receiving total knee arthroplasty with or without resection of the posterior cruciate ligament for the treatment of osteoarthritis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table 4: refining rehabilitation: three months of postoperative night splinting with hand therapy vs hand therapy alone

DASH hand function score at 3 months Major outcome group 1 (hand function) (scores between 0 and 100, where 0 represents no impairment in hand function and 100 represents maximum impairment in hand function) · 210 participants with Dupuytren's disease of the fingers in 2 studies (225 digits reported across all studies) (Collis 2013;…
1 finding from 1 review