Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,447 questions · 2,590 findings · 266 reviews

No studies found 699 · 27%GRADE not reported 289 · 11.2%Very low 614 · 23.7%Low 605 · 23.4%Moderate 322 · 12.4%High 61 · 2.4%

Educational intervention vs no educational intervention

Uncorrected visual acuity deficit due to refractive error · school‐age children and adolescents

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Primary outcome 1: participant‐ or parent‐rated symptoms of eczema (SCORAD part C) at the end of active treatment Visual analogue scale for itch and sleep disturbance ranging from 0 to 10 for each symptom and combined ranging from 0 to 20. The hig... · male and female patients 0 to 55 years of age with physician‐diagnosed eczema
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Primary outcome 1: participant‐ or parent‐rated global change in eczema symptoms at the end of active treatment (binary outcome) Change in risk for worsened/unchanged eczema Duration of · male and female patients 0 to 55 years of age with physician‐diagnosed eczema

The intervention showed no clear difference in primary outcome 1: participant‐ or parent‐rated global change in… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Primary outcome 2: participant‐ or parent‐rated participant quality of life score at the end of active treatment Scales used: DLQI, IDQoL, Skindex‐29, CDLQI. On those scales, the higher the score, the more severely the quality of life is affected ... · male and female patients 0 to 55 years of age with physician‐diagnosed eczema
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Primary outcome 2: participant‐ or parent‐rated family quality of life score at the end of active treatment Scale used: DFI, FDLQI. On those scales, the higher the score, the more severely the quality of life is affected Duration of · male and female patients 0 to 55 years of age with physician‐diagnosed eczema
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Secondary outcome 4: global eczema severity score (total SCORAD) at the end of active treatment (Investigator‐rated eczema severity) Scale used: total SCORAD ranging from 0 to 103. The higher the score, the more severe the disease Duration of · male and female patients 0 to 55 years of age with physician‐diagnosed eczema
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Secondary outcome 6: adverse events (gastrointestinal symptoms) during active treatment Duration of · male and female patients 0 to 55 years of age with physician‐diagnosed eczema

The intervention showed no clear difference in secondary outcome 6: adverse events (gastrointestinal symptoms)… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis

All‐cause mortality (main analysis ‐ active cancer) · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism

Low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality (main analysis ‐ active cancer) compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis

Recurrent venous thromboembolism (main analysis ‐ active cancer) · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism

Low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis probably leads to lower recurrent venous thromboembolism (main analysis ‐ active cancer) compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis

Major bleeding · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism

Low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in major bleeding (main analysis ‐ active cancer) compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis

Minor bleeding (main analysis ‐ active cancer) · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism

It is very uncertain whether low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis changes minor bleeding (main analysis ‐ active cancer) compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Low molecular weight heparin vs vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis

Thrombocytopenia (main analysis‐ active cancer) · patients with cancer with venous thromboembolism

Low molecular weight heparin secondary prophylaxis showed no clear difference in thrombocytopenia (main analysis‐ active cancer) compared with vitamin K antagonist secondary prophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor therapy vs conventional laser/cryotherapy

Refractive error ‐ very high myopia ‐ at 30 months of age (unit of analysis: eyes) · preterm infants with type 1 ROP

Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor therapy may leads to lower refractive error ‐ very high myopia ‐ at 30 months of age (unit of… compared with conventional laser/cryotherapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Other (active dissemination vs passive dissemination) · Pregnant women who smoke

The intervention showed no clear difference in other (active dissemination vs passive dissemination) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review