Intervention not reported
OS · couples with unexplained infertility
The intervention showed no clear difference in OS (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.2 [0.57, 2.52]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
IUI · couples with unexplained infertility
The intervention showed no clear difference in IUI (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.33 [0.67, 3.58]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
OS‐IUI · couples with unexplained infertility
The intervention showed no clear difference in OS‐IUI (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.17 [0.64, 2.12]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Comparator · couples with unexplained infertility
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Expectant management/IUI · couples with unexplained infertility
The intervention showed no clear difference in expectant management/IUI (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 3.07 [1, 9.41]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
OS · couples with unexplained infertility
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes OS (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 1.09 [0.38, 3.15]
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
OS‐IUI · couples with unexplained infertility
The intervention showed no clear difference in OS‐IUI (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
OR 0.8 [0.37, 1.73]
Studies not reported
Low
Postoperative amenorrhoea at 12 months or less · women with heavy menstrual bleeding
It is very uncertain whether gnRH analogues changes postoperative amenorrhoea at 12 months or less compared with placebo or no treatment (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.58 [1.24, 2.01]
605 participants
Very low
Postoperative amenorrhoea at 12 months or less · women with heavy menstrual bleeding
It is very uncertain whether gnRH analogues changes postoperative amenorrhoea at 12 months or less compared with danazol (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.17 [0.9, 1.52]
340 participants
Very low
Postoperative amenorrhoea at 12 months or less · women with heavy menstrual bleeding
It is very uncertain whether gnRH analogues changes postoperative amenorrhoea at 12 months or less compared with progestogens (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.58 [0.96, 2.61]
146 participants
Very low
Postoperative amenorrhoea at 12 months or less · women with heavy menstrual bleeding
GnRH analogue showed no clear difference in postoperative amenorrhoea at 12 months or less compared with gnRH antagonist (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.95 [0.79, 1.14]
100 participants
Moderate
Postoperative amenorrhoea at 12 months or less · women with heavy menstrual bleeding
It is very uncertain whether gnRH analogue changes postoperative amenorrhoea at 12 months or less compared with dilatation & curettage (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 20.12 [1.21, 333.63]
92 participants
Very low
Postoperative amenorrhoea at 12 months or less · women with heavy menstrual bleeding
Danazol showed no clear difference in postoperative amenorrhoea at 12 months or less compared with no pretreatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.05 [0.8, 1.39]
179 participants
Low
Postoperative amenorrhoea at 12 months or less · women with heavy menstrual bleeding
Progestogens showed no clear difference in postoperative amenorrhoea at 12 months or less compared with no pretreatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.54 [0.26, 1.12]
50 participants
Low
Postoperative amenorrhoea at 12 months or less · women with heavy menstrual bleeding
Danazol may leads to higher postoperative amenorrhoea at 12 months or less compared with progestogens (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.89 [1.12, 3.18]
103 participants
Low
Postoperative amenorrhoea at 12 months or less · women with heavy menstrual bleeding
GnRHa or danazol showed no clear difference in postoperative amenorrhoea at 12 months or less compared with no pretreatment (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.13 [0.89, 1.43]
280 participants
Low