Mean adverse events: not reported · treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Mean upper extremity activity · treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
Mean upper extremity impairment · treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
Activities of daily living · treating upper extremity deficits in individuals with hemiparesis after stroke
1 finding from 1 review
Abstinence · individuals dependent on illicit opiates
Dihydrocodeine showed no clear difference in abstinence Assessed by urinalysis post‐detoxification compared with buprenorphine (low certainty).
3 findings from 1 review
RR 0.42 [0.11, 1.57]
2 studies · 150 participants
Low
RR 0.59 [0.26, 1.31]
2 studies · 150 participants
Low
RR 0.59 [0.25, 1.39]
2 studies · 150 participants
Low
Serious adverse events or adverse events · individuals dependent on illicit opiates
1 finding from 1 review
Treatment retention Early dropout · individuals dependent on illicit opiates
Dihydrocodeine showed no clear difference in treatment retention Early dropout compared with buprenorphine (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Abstinence · individuals dependent on illicit opiates
Dihydrocodeine showed no clear difference in abstinence compared with methadone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events or adverse events Death due to methadone use · individuals dependent on illicit opiates
1 finding from 1 review
Retention in treatment · individuals dependent on illicit opiates
Dihydrocodeine showed no clear difference in treatment retention compared with methadone (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
WORK PARTICIPATION · People with non‐specific low back pain presenting to healthcare, occupational, general or mixed populations Prognostic factor: Individual…
The intervention probably leads to higher WORK PARTICIPATION (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
IMPORTANT RECOVERY · People with non‐specific low back pain presenting to healthcare, occupational, general or mixed populations Prognostic factor: Individual…
The intervention may leads to higher IMPORTANT RECOVERY (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
FUNCTIONAL LIMITATIONS · People with non‐specific low back pain presenting to healthcare, occupational, general or mixed populations Prognostic factor: Individual…
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes FUNCTIONAL LIMITATIONS (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
PAIN INTENSITY · People with non‐specific low back pain presenting to healthcare, occupational, general or mixed populations Prognostic factor: Individual…
The intervention may leads to higher PAIN INTENSITY (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Test result · HIV‐positive individuals
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
True positives (participants correctly classified as having tuberculosis) · HIV‐positive individuals
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
368 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
False negatives (participants incorrectly classified as not having tuberculosis) · HIV‐positive individuals
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
368 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
True negatives (participants correctly classified as not having tuberculosis) · HIV‐positive individuals
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
511 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
False positives (participants incorrectly classified as having tuberculosis) · HIV‐positive individuals
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
511 participants
Very low
Intervention not reported
Virological success · antiretroviral‐naïve individuals
The intervention showed no clear difference in virological success (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review