Cost‐effectiveness · children between the ages of 1 month and 18 years who were admitted to a pediatric inpatient setting from another location
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Delirium incidence or delirium‐free days at hospital discharge · children between the ages of 1 month and 18 years who were admitted to a pediatric inpatient setting from another location
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Duration of mechanical ventilation · children between the ages of 1 month and 18 years who were admitted to a pediatric inpatient setting from another location
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Length of hospital stay · children between the ages of 1 month and 18 years who were admitted to a pediatric inpatient setting from another location
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Objective measures of sleep · children between the ages of 1 month and 18 years who were admitted to a pediatric inpatient setting from another location
1 finding from 1 review
Subjective sleep quality or quantity · children between the ages of 1 month and 18 years who were admitted to a pediatric inpatient setting from another location
1 finding from 1 review
Adherence · people with asthma
1 finding from 1 review
Asthma control · people with asthma
1 finding from 1 review
Asthma exacerbations · people with asthma
Digital adherence interventions may leads to lower asthma exacerbations ‐ Number of people with one or more exacerbations compared with usual care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Unscheduled healthcare utilisation ‐ number of hospital or GP/ED visits · people with asthma
Digital adherence interventions showed no clear difference in unscheduled healthcare utilisation ‐ number of hospital or GP/ED… compared with usual care (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
FEV1 (% predicted): mean change from baseline · people with asthma
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · people with asthma
1 finding from 1 review
Return to work · cancer patients
Psycho‐educational interventions showed no clear difference in RTW compared with care (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · cancer patients
1 finding from 1 review
Visual acuity · people with traumatic hyphema
Non‐pharmaceutical interventions showed no clear difference in short‐term visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/60 at end of… compared with control (low certainty).
2 findings from 1 review
Final visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/50; monocular vs binocular eye patching · people with traumatic hyphema
Non‐pharmaceutical interventions showed no clear difference in final visual acuity between 20/20 and 20/50; monocular vs binocular… compared with control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Time to resolution of primary hemorrhage · people with traumatic hyphema
1 finding from 1 review
Risk of secondary hemorrhage; monocular versus binocular eye patching · people with traumatic hyphema
Non‐pharmaceutical interventions showed no clear difference in risk of secondary hemorrhage; monocular vs binocular eye patching compared with control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Risk of secondary hemorrhage; ambulatory treatment versus bed rest · people with traumatic hyphema
Non‐pharmaceutical interventions showed no clear difference in risk of secondary hemorrhage; ambulatory treatment vs bed rest compared with control (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Health literacy – Multiple outcomes and measures used: (1) Generic health literacy Functional health literacy, TOFHLA (score · migrants
1 finding from 1 review