Cochrane · systematic review · CD007569

Non‐medical interventions to enhance return to work for people with cancer

de Boer, AGEM, Tamminga, SJ, Boschman, JS, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2024 · Cochrane Library

Work2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
8
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 12.5%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 12.5%Low 3 · 37.5%Moderate 3 · 37.5%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Show all 2 versions

Psycho‐educational interventions compared to care as usual for people with cancer

Population: people with cancer
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
RTW
Psycho‐educational interventions vs care
RR 1.09 [0.96, 1.24]4 studies · 512 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
QoL
Psycho‐educational interventions vs care
no estimate extracted1 study · 124 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Vocational interventions compared to care as usual for people with cancer

Population: people with cancer
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
RTW
Vocational interventions vs care
RR 0.94 [0.78, 1.13]1 study · 34 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
QoL
Vocational interventions vs care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Physical interventions compared to care as usual for people with cancer

Population: people with cancer
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
RTW
Physical interventions vs care
RR 1.23 [1.08, 1.39]4 studies · 434 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision
QoL
Physical interventions vs care
no estimate extracted1 study · 173 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Multidisciplinary interventions compared to care as usual for people with cancer

Population: people with cancer
2 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
RTW
Multidisciplinary interventions vs care
RR 1.23 [1.09, 1.33]6 studies · 497 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias
QoL
Multidisciplinary interventions vs care
no estimate extracted3 studies · 378 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision