Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3,801 questions · 4,079 findings · 473 reviews

No studies found 669 · 16.4%GRADE not reported 852 · 20.9%Very low 738 · 18.1%Low 903 · 22.1%Moderate 716 · 17.6%High 201 · 4.9%

Intense pulsed light vs no treatment

Participant global assessment: satisfaction with treatment Questionnaire · participants with hidradenitis suppurativa

Intense pulsed light may leads to higher participant global assessment: satisfaction with treatment… compared with no treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intense pulsed light vs no treatment

Participant global assessment: satisfaction with treatment ‐ axilla Questionnaire · participants with hidradenitis suppurativa

Intense pulsed light may leads to higher participant global assessment: satisfaction with treatment ‐ axilla… compared with no treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intense pulsed light vs no treatment

Participant global assessment: satisfaction with treatment ‐ groin Questionnaire · participants with hidradenitis suppurativa

Intense pulsed light showed no clear difference in participant global assessment: satisfaction with treatment ‐ groin… compared with no treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intense pulsed light vs no treatment

Participant global assessment: satisfaction with treatment ‐ inframammary Questionnaire · participants with hidradenitis suppurativa

Intense pulsed light showed no clear difference in participant global assessment: satisfaction with treatment ‐… compared with no treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cervical pull headgear vs Minor interceptive procedures (control)

Amount of crowding (lower incisor crowding) at 10 weeks · Children or adolescents (aged 16 years old or under) receiving orthodontic treatment to prevent or correct crowded teeth

It is very uncertain whether cervical pull headgear changes amount of crowding (lower incisor crowding) at 2 years compared with minor interceptive procedures (control) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Cervical pull headgear vs Minor interceptive procedures (control)

Size of the jaws (maxillary and mandibular arch length) · Children or adolescents (aged 16 years old or under) receiving orthodontic treatment to prevent or correct crowded teeth

Cervical pull headgear led to higher size of the jaws (maxillary and mandibular arch length) compared with minor interceptive procedures (control); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Cervical pull headgear vs Minor interceptive procedures (control)

Position of the incisors (upper incisor inclination) · Children or adolescents (aged 16 years old or under) receiving orthodontic treatment to prevent or correct crowded teeth

Cervical pull headgear led to higher upper incisors to maxilla at 2 years compared with minor interceptive procedures (control); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review