evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,695 questions · 4,979 findings · 433 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 998 · 20%GRADE not reported 1,140 · 22.9%Very low 1,024 · 20.6%Low 1,029 · 20.7%Moderate 636 · 12.8%High 152 · 3.1%

Fluorescence imaging / light-based techniques vs No screening

Outcome not reported · Planned population: general population or high-risk / opportunistic screening groups (no eligible study)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Triclosan/copolymer-containing fluoride toothpaste vs Fluoride toothpaste without triclosan

Periodontitis (clinical attachment loss) · Children and adults (aged 16 years or less = children, over 16 = adults) without periodontitis at baseline; in practice mostly adults,…

Triclosan/copolymer-containing fluoride toothpaste showed no clear difference in periodontitis at 36 months (attachment loss > 0 mm) compared with fluoride toothpaste without triclosan (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use vs no intervention

Consistent application of condom by FSWs · sex workers

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use showed no clear difference in consistent application of condom by FSWs compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use vs no intervention

HIV knowledge among FSWs at 6‐month · sex workers

It is very uncertain whether social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use changes HIV knowledge among FSWs at 6‐month compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use vs no intervention

Psychosocial barriers to condom use among FSWs at 6‐month · sex workers

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use showed no clear difference in psychosocial barriers to condom use among FSWs at 6‐month compared with no intervention (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use vs no intervention

Psychosocial barriers to condom use self‐efficacy among FSWs at 6‐month · sex workers

It is very uncertain whether social cognitive theory for promotion of condom use changes psychosocial barriers to condom use self‐efficacy among FSWs at… compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Promotion of female and male condom vs promotion of male condom

HIV incidence among FSWs at 3‐month · sex workers

Promotion of female and male condom showed no clear difference in HIV incidence among FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Promotion of female and male condom vs promotion of male condom

Chlamydia incidence among FSWs at 3‐month · sex workers

Promotion of female and male condom leads to lower chlamydia incidence among FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Promotion of female and male condom vs promotion of male condom

Gonorrhoea incidence among FSWs at 3‐month · sex workers

Promotion of female and male condom leads to lower gonorrhoea incidence among FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Promotion of female and male condom vs promotion of male condom

Use of birth control methods (consistent condom use) · sex workers

Promotion of female and male condom leads to lower consistent male condom use at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (high certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Promotion of female and male condom vs promotion of male condom

Consistent female condom use by FSWs at 24‐month · sex workers

Promotion of female and male condom leads to lower consistent female condom use by FSWs at 3‐month compared with promotion of male condom (high certainty).

2 findings from 1 review