Adverse events · people who received phacoemulsification
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Economic outcomes · people who received phacoemulsification
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intraocular inflammation measured by anterior chamber cell and flare 1 week · people who received phacoemulsification
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intraocular inflammation measured by proportion of participants with corneal edema 1 week · people who received phacoemulsification
Summary of findings for NSAIDs plus corticosteroids showed no clear difference in intraocular inflammation measured by proportion of participants with… compared with corticosteroids alone (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Recurrence of pterygium ( · individuals with pterygium
The intervention may leads to lower recurrence of pterygium ( (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.47 [0.27, 0.82]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Occurrence of complication · individuals with pterygium
The intervention may leads to higher occurrence of complication (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 1.92 [1.22, 3.02]
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Operating time · individuals with pterygium
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low
Intervention not reported
Good functional vision: presenting visual acuity of 6/12 or better at 6‐8 weeks · people with age‐related cataract
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Intraoperative and immediate post‐operative complications · people with age‐related cataract
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Quality of life · people with age‐related cataract
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Cost‐effectiveness · people with age‐related cataract
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Good functional vision (presenting visual acuity 6/12 or better) · people with age‐related cataract
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Poor visual outcome (best‐corrected visual acuity worse than 6/60) · people with age‐related cataract
It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes poor visual outcome (best‐corrected visual acuity worse than 6/60) (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Other complications · people with age‐related cataract
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Quality of life · people with age‐related cataract
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Costs · people with age‐related cataract
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Visual loss of 2+ lines at 1 year · patients with choroidal neovascularisation secondary to age‐related macular degeneration
The intervention showed no clear difference in visual loss of 2+ lines at 1 year (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Visual gain of 2+ lines at 1 year · patients with choroidal neovascularisation secondary to age‐related macular degeneration
The intervention showed no clear difference in visual gain of 2+ lines at 1 year (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Contrast threshold loss ‐0.15 log units or more at 1 year · patients with choroidal neovascularisation secondary to age‐related macular degeneration
The intervention showed no clear difference in contrast threshold loss ‐0.15 log units or more at 1 year (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Reading speed 40 word/minute or more after 1 year · patients with choroidal neovascularisation secondary to age‐related macular degeneration
The intervention showed no clear difference in reading speed 40 word/minute or more after 1 year (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review