Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4,587 questions · 5,761 findings · 495 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1,011 · 17.5%GRADE not reported 1,797 · 31.2%Very low 1,100 · 19.1%Low 1,052 · 18.3%Moderate 649 · 11.3%High 152 · 2.6%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Subcutaneous EPO with oral iron vs oral iron

Fatigue ‐ not reported · women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Subcutaneous EPO with oral iron vs oral iron

Persistent anaemia symptoms ‐ not reported · women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Subcutaneous EPO with oral iron vs oral iron

Thromboembolic events ‐ not reported · women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Treatment for women with postpartum iron deficiency anaemia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Another (different) intraoral distalising appliance

Number of visits to complete treatment · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or less at the start of treatment) undergoing orthodontic treatment to distalise upper first…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
Number of attendances required to complete treatment was not reported by these studies.
0 studies
No studies found

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Headgear (extraoral appliance)

Movement of upper first molars (mm) · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or less at the start of treatment) undergoing orthodontic treatment to distalise upper first…

It is very uncertain whether intraoral distalising appliance changes movement of upper first molars (mm) compared with headgear (extraoral appliance) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
MD -1.45 [-2.74, -0.15]
4 studies · 150 participants
Very low

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Headgear (extraoral appliance)

Non-compliance rate of the intervention · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or less at the start of treatment) undergoing orthodontic treatment to distalise upper first…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
Non-compliance rate not reported ("The remaining secondary outcomes and adverse effects were not reported by these studies").
0 studies
No studies found

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Headgear (extraoral appliance)

Adverse effects (headgear injuries, gum health, tooth damage/decay, root resorption) · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or less at the start of treatment) undergoing orthodontic treatment to distalise upper first…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
Adverse effects were not reported by these studies.
0 studies
No studies found

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Another (different) intraoral distalising appliance

Duration of treatment · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or less at the start of treatment) undergoing orthodontic treatment to distalise upper first…

1 finding from 1 review

Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
Duration of treatment reported by 2 studies (Altug-Atac 2008, Karacay 2006); not GRADE-rated and not in a SoF table. 3D bimetric distalising arch 3.4 months vs modified Begg intraoral distalising system 6.5 months (MD…
2 studies
GRADE not reported

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Headgear (extraoral appliance)

Duration of treatment · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or less at the start of treatment) undergoing orthodontic treatment to distalise upper first…

1 finding from 1 review

Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
Duration of treatment (to end of molar distalisation) reported by 3 studies (120 participants); not GRADE-rated and not in a SoF table. Bondemark 2005: intraoral appliance with superelastic coils 5.2 months (SD 1) vs…
3 studies · 120 participants
GRADE not reported

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Another (different) intraoral distalising appliance

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
Adverse effects were not reported by these studies.
0 studies
No studies found

Intraoral distalising appliance vs Another (different) intraoral distalising appliance

Non-compliance rate of the intervention · Children and adolescents (aged 16 years or less at the start of treatment) undergoing orthodontic treatment to distalise upper first…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Orthodontic treatment for distalising upper first molars in children and adolescents 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
Non-compliance rate not reported ("The remaining secondary outcomes and adverse effects were not reported by these studies").
0 studies
No studies found

Oral stimulation vs usual care

Time (days) spent in NICU ‐ not reported · preterm infants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Oral stimulation for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral stimulation vs usual care

Length of hospital stay · preterm infants

1 finding from 1 review

Oral stimulation for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 249 participants
Very low

Oral stimulation vs usual care

Duration (days) of parenteral nutrition ‐ not reported · preterm infants

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Oral stimulation for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral antibiotics vs placebo

Subjective improvement in symptoms at 1 month and 3 months · adult participants with chronic blepharitis

1 finding from 1 review

Oral antibiotics for chronic blepharitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 70 participants
Very low

Oral antibiotics vs placebo

Measurements of eradication or decrease in numbers of colonies of positive cultures of bacteria · adult participants with chronic blepharitis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Oral antibiotics for chronic blepharitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Oral antibiotics vs placebo

Clinical signs—Schirmer test scores at 1 month (mm/5 min) · adult participants with chronic blepharitis

1 finding from 1 review

Oral antibiotics for chronic blepharitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 93 participants
Very low

Oral antibiotics vs placebo

Clinical signs—TBUT at 1 month (seconds) · adult participants with chronic blepharitis

1 finding from 1 review

Oral antibiotics for chronic blepharitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 93 participants
Very low

Oral antibiotics vs placebo

Adverse events at 1 month · adult participants with chronic blepharitis

It is very uncertain whether oral antibiotics changes adverse events at 1 month compared with placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral antibiotics for chronic blepharitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 6.13 [1.94, 19.41]
1 study · 93 participants
Very low

Oral antibiotics vs placebo

Quality of life measures · adult participants with chronic blepharitis

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Oral antibiotics for chronic blepharitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found