Cochrane · systematic review · CD009720

Oral stimulation for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants

Greene, Z, O'Donnell, CPF, Walshe, M · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library

Neonatal2 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
8
current version
GRADE rated
5
No studies
3
Included studies
NR
No studies 3 · 37.5%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 50%Low 1 · 12.5%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Show all 2 versions

Oral stimulation compared to standard care for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants

Population: preterm infants
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Time (days) to achieve exclusive oral feeding
Oral stimulation vs standard care
no estimate extracted6 studies · 292 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Time (days) spent in NICU ‐ not reported
Oral stimulation vs standard care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Total hospital stay (days)
Oral stimulation vs standard care
no estimate extracted5 studies · 249 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Duration (days) of parenteral nutrition ‐ not reported
Oral stimulation vs standard care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Oral stimulation compared to non‐oral intervention for promoting oral feeding in preterm infants

Population: preterm infants
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Time (days) to achieve exclusive oral feeding
Oral stimulation vs non‐oral intervention
no estimate extracted10 studies · 574 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Time (days) spent in NICU ‐ not reported
Oral stimulation vs non‐oral intervention
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Total hospital stay (days)
Oral stimulation vs non‐oral intervention
no estimate extracted10 studies · 591 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Duration (days) of parenteral nutrition
Oral stimulation vs non‐oral intervention
no estimate extracted3 studies · 268 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias