Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,815 questions · 6,211 findings · 638 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 1,052 · 16.9%GRADE not reported 441 · 7.1%Very low 1,700 · 27.4%Low 1,651 · 26.6%Moderate 1,070 · 17.2%High 297 · 4.8%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

LABA/LAMA vs LABA plus inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)

Severe exacerbations: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%

LABA/LAMA showed no clear difference in severe exacerbations: low‐risk population compared with LABA/ICS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

LABA/LAMA vs LABA plus inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)

Pneumonia: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%

LABA/LAMA probably leads to lower pneumonia: high‐risk population compared with LABA/ICS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

LABA/LAMA vs LABA plus inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)

Pneumonia: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%

LABA/LAMA probably leads to lower pneumonia: low‐risk population compared with LABA/ICS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

LABA/LAMA vs LAMA

Moderate to severe exacerbations: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%

LABA/LAMA showed no clear difference in moderate to severe exacerbations: high‐risk population compared with LAMA (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

LABA/LAMA vs LAMA

Moderate to severe exacerbations: low‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%

LABA/LAMA showed no clear difference in moderate to severe exacerbations: low‐risk population compared with LAMA (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

LABA/LAMA vs LAMA

Severe exacerbations: high‐risk population · chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with predicted FEV1 of less than 80%

LABA/LAMA showed no clear difference in severe exacerbations: high‐risk population compared with LAMA (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Early taxane‐based chemotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs ADT only

Death (all causes)

Early taxane‐based chemotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) probably leads to lower time to death due to any cause (absolute effect size estimates based… compared with ADT only (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Early taxane‐based chemotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs ADT only

Time to progression

Early taxane‐based chemotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) probably leads to lower time to progression (absolute effect size estimates based on… compared with ADT only (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral ivermectin 200 μg/kg (1 to 3 doses) vs topical ivermectin 1% lotion/solution (1 to 3 applications)

Complete clearance · people with scabies, 5 to 80 years of ageLocation: Egypt, India

Oral ivermectin 200 μg/kg (1 to 3 doses) showed no clear difference in complete clearance ‐ week 1 compared with topical ivermectin 1% lotion/solution (1 to 3 applications) (low certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

Oral ivermectin 200 μg/kg (1 to 3 doses) vs topical ivermectin 1% lotion/solution (1 to 3 applications)

Number of participants with ≥ 1 AE ‐ week 4 · people with scabies, 5 to 80 years of ageLocation: Egypt, India

It is very uncertain whether oral ivermectin 200 μg/kg (1 to 3 doses) changes number of participants with ≥ 1 AE ‐ week 4 compared with topical ivermectin 1% lotion/solution (1 to 3 applications) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Overall survival## · patients with multiple myeloma

The intervention showed no clear difference in overall survival## (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Progression‐free survival### · patients with multiple myeloma

The intervention showed no clear difference in progression‐free survival### (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review