Cochrane · systematic review · CD003188

Bisphosphonates in multiple myeloma: an updated network meta‐analysis

Mhaskar, R, Kumar, A, Miladinovic, B, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library

Haematology3 versionsAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 14.3%Low 2 · 28.6%Moderate 4 · 57.1%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Show all 3 versions

Summary of findings (direct comparisons)

Population: patients with multiple myeloma
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Overall survival##
HR 0.9 [0.76, 1.07]14 studies · 2706 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency
Progression‐free survival###
HR 0.75 [0.57, 1]7 studies · 908 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias
Vertebral fractures
RR 0.74 [0.62, 0.89]7 studies · 1116 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias
Non‐vertebral fractures
RR 1.03 [0.68, 1.56]6 studies · 1389 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias
Skeletal‐related events
RR 0.74 [0.63, 0.88]10 studies · 2141 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, publication bias
Pain
RR 0.75 [0.6, 0.95]8 studies · 1281 participantsVery low
Osteonecrosis of jaw
RR 4.61 [0.99, 21.35]6 studies · 1284 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, publication bias