Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,558 questions in 115 reviews · Vascular

current versions
No studies 346 · 22.2%Ungraded 90 · 5.8%Very low 281 · 18%Low 477 · 30.6%Moderate 313 · 20.1%High 51 · 3.3%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
NSAIDs vs placebo
Symptomatic VTE · people with superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg
Treatment for superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.91 [0.25, 3.28]1 study · 211 participantsLow
NSAIDs vs placebo
Major bleeding · people with superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg
Treatment for superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 211 participantsLow
NSAIDs vs placebo
Extension or recurrence (or both) of ST · people with superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg
Treatment for superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.46 [0.27, 0.78]1 study · 211 participantsLow
NSAIDs vs placebo
Mortality · people with superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg
Treatment for superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
NSAIDs vs placebo
Minor bleeding · people with superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg
Treatment for superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
NSAIDs vs placebo
Adverse effects of treatment · people with superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg
Treatment for superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Fondaparinux vs placebo
Extension of ST Ultrasonography · people with ST of the leg
Treatment for superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.08 [0.03, 0.22]1 study · 3002 participantsModerate
Fondaparinux vs placebo
Recurrence of ST Ultrasonography · people with ST of the leg
Treatment for superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.21 [0.08, 0.54]1 study · 3002 participantsModerate
Fondaparinux vs placebo
Mortality · people with ST of the leg
Treatment for superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg (2018) · Cochrane
RR 2 [0.18, 22]1 study · 3002 participantsModerate
Fondaparinux vs placebo
Minor bleeding · people with ST of the leg
Treatment for superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.49 [0.53, 4.17]1 study · 2987 participantsModerate
Fondaparinux vs placebo
Adverse effects of treatment · people with ST of the leg
Treatment for superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.13 [0.78, 1.65]1 study · 2987 participantsModerate
Prophylactic LMWH vs placebo
Symptomatic VTE · people with ST of the leg
Treatment for superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.22 [0.38, 3.89]1 study · 222 participantsLow
Prophylactic LMWH vs placebo
Major bleeding · people with ST of the leg
Treatment for superficial thrombophlebitis of the leg (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 222 participantsLow
Intervention NR
Success of prosthetic rehabilitation (preference) (1 day) · adults over the age of 50 with a unilateral transfemoral amputation
Prosthetic rehabilitation for older dysvascular people following a unilateral transfemoral amputation (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 10 participantsVery low
Intervention NR
Adverse effects (1 day) · adults over the age of 50 with a unilateral transfemoral amputation
Prosthetic rehabilitation for older dysvascular people following a unilateral transfemoral amputation (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Supervised exercise therapy vs home‐based exercise therapy
Maximal treadmill walking distance after 3 months · patients with intermittent claudication
Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent… (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 351 participantsModerate
Supervised exercise therapy vs walking advice
Self‐reported functional impairment after 3 months (Walking Impairment Questionnaire combined) Scale: 1 to 100 (higher scores indicate better walking) · patients with intermittent claudication
Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent… (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 483 participantsHigh
Home‐based exercise therapy vs walking advice
Maximal treadmill walking distance after 3 months · patients with intermittent claudication
Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent… (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 137 participantsModerate
Home‐based exercise therapy vs walking advice
Pain‐free treadmill walking distance after 3 months · patients with intermittent claudication
Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent… (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 107 participantsLow
Home‐based exercise therapy vs walking advice
Quality of life ‐ physical after 3 months (Short Form 36 physical component summary) Scale: 1 to 100 (higher scores indicate better quality of life) · patients with intermittent claudication
Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent… (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Home‐based exercise therapy vs walking advice
Quality of life ‐ mental after 3 months (Short Form 36 mental component summary) Scale: 1 to 100 (higher scores indicate better quality of life) · patients with intermittent claudication
Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent… (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Home‐based exercise therapy vs walking advice
Self‐reported functional impairment after 3 months (Walking Impairment Questionnaire combined) Scale: 1 to 100 (higher scores indicate better walking) · patients with intermittent claudication
Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent… (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 79 participantsModerate
Supervised exercise therapy vs home‐based exercise therapy
Pain‐free treadmill walking distance after 3 months · patients with intermittent claudication
Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent… (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 322 participantsModerate
Supervised exercise therapy vs home‐based exercise therapy
Quality of life ‐ physical after 3 months (Short Form 36 physical component summary) Scale: 1 to 100 (higher scores indicate better quality of life) · patients with intermittent claudication
Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent… (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 68 participantsLow
Supervised exercise therapy vs home‐based exercise therapy
Quality of life ‐ mental after 3 months (Short Form 36 mental component summary) Scale: 1 to 100 (higher scores indicate better quality of life) · patients with intermittent claudication
Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent… (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 68 participantsLow
Supervised exercise therapy vs home‐based exercise therapy
Self‐reported functional impairment after 3 months (Walking Impairment Questionnaire combined) Scale: 1 to 100 (higher scores indicate better walking) · patients with intermittent claudication
Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent… (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 62 participantsVery low
Supervised exercise therapy vs walking advice
Maximal treadmill walking distance after 3 months · patients with intermittent claudication
Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent… (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 624 participantsHigh
Supervised exercise therapy vs walking advice
Pain‐free treadmill walking distance after 3 months · patients with intermittent claudication
Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent… (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 508 participantsHigh
Supervised exercise therapy vs walking advice
Quality of life ‐ physical after 3 months (Short Form 36 physical component summary) Scale: 1 to 100 (higher scores indicate better quality of life) · patients with intermittent claudication
Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent… (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 296 participantsLow
Supervised exercise therapy vs walking advice
Quality of life ‐ mental after 3 months (Short Form 36 mental component summary) Scale: 1 to 100 (higher scores indicate better quality of life) · patients with intermittent claudication
Supervised exercise therapy versus home‐based exercise therapy versus walking advice for intermittent… (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 296 participantsLow
Rutosides vs placebo (or no treatment)
Occurrence of leg ulceration · patients with PTS
Rutosides for treatment of post‐thrombotic syndrome (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Rutosides vs an alternative venoactive remedy (hidrosmina)
Improvement in PTS (6 months) · patients with PTS
Rutosides for treatment of post‐thrombotic syndrome (2018) · Cochrane
OR 0.18 [0.04, 0.94]1 study · 29 participantsLow
Rutosides vs an alternative venoactive remedy (hidrosmina)
Deterioration in PTS (6 months) · patients with PTS
Rutosides for treatment of post‐thrombotic syndrome (2018) · Cochrane
OR 0.19 [0.01, 4.24]1 study · 29 participantsLow
Rutosides vs an alternative venoactive remedy (hidrosmina)
Adverse effects · patients with PTS
Rutosides for treatment of post‐thrombotic syndrome (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Rutosides vs placebo (or no treatment)
Improvement in PTS (8 weeks ‐ 12 months) · patients with PTS
Rutosides for treatment of post‐thrombotic syndrome (2018) · Cochrane
OR 1.29 [0.69, 2.41]2 studies · 164 participantsLow
Rutosides vs placebo (or no treatment)
Deterioration in PTS (8 weeks ‐ 12 months) · patients with PTS
Rutosides for treatment of post‐thrombotic syndrome (2018) · Cochrane
OR 0.61 [0.19, 1.9]1 study · 80 participantsLow
Rutosides vs placebo (or no treatment)
Adverse effects (8 weeks ‐ 12 months) · patients with PTS
Rutosides for treatment of post‐thrombotic syndrome (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Rutosides vs elastic compression stockings
Occurrence of leg ulceration · patients with PTS
Rutosides for treatment of post‐thrombotic syndrome (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Rutosides vs elastic compression stockings
Improvement in PTS (12 months) · patients with PTS
Rutosides for treatment of post‐thrombotic syndrome (2018) · Cochrane
OR 0.8 [0.31, 2.03]1 study · 80 participantsLow
Rutosides vs elastic compression stockings
Deterioration in PTS (12 months) · patients with PTS
Rutosides for treatment of post‐thrombotic syndrome (2018) · Cochrane
OR 0.61 [0.19, 1.9]1 study · 80 participantsLow
Rutosides vs elastic compression stockings
Adverse effects (12 months) · patients with PTS
Rutosides for treatment of post‐thrombotic syndrome (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Rutosides vs an alternative venoactive remedy (hidrosmina)
Occurrence of leg ulceration · patients with PTS
Rutosides for treatment of post‐thrombotic syndrome (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prostanoids vs placebo
Cardiovascular mortality · people with critical limb ischaemia
Prostanoids for critical limb ischaemia (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.81 [0.41, 1.58]3 studies · 1170 participantsLow
Prostanoids vs pentoxifylline
Adverse events (participants) · people with critical limb ischaemia
Prostanoids for critical limb ischaemia (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.6 [0.24, 1.47]1 study · 70 participantsVery low
Prostanoids vs pentoxifylline
Rest‐pain relief · people with critical limb ischaemia
Prostanoids for critical limb ischaemia (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.4 [0.72, 2.72]1 study · 70 participantsVery low
Prostanoids vs pentoxifylline
Ulcer healing · people with critical limb ischaemia
Prostanoids for critical limb ischaemia (2018) · Cochrane
RR 1.61 [1.13, 2.3]1 study · 70 participantsVery low
Prostanoids vs naftidrofuryl
Cardiovascular mortality · people with critical limb ischaemia
Prostanoids for critical limb ischaemia (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prostanoids vs naftidrofuryl
Total amputations · people with critical limb ischaemia
Prostanoids for critical limb ischaemia (2018) · Cochrane
RR 0.96 [0.57, 1.64]1 study · 29 participantsLow
Prostanoids vs naftidrofuryl
Quality of life · people with critical limb ischaemia
Prostanoids for critical limb ischaemia (2018) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Prostanoids vs naftidrofuryl
Adverse events (participants) · people with critical limb ischaemia
Prostanoids for critical limb ischaemia (2018) · Cochrane
RR 3.29 [0.27, 40.19]2 studies · 55 participantsLow