Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,886 questions in 74 reviews · Skin

current versions
No studies 542 · 28.7%Ungraded 130 · 6.9%Very low 326 · 17.3%Low 434 · 23%Moderate 348 · 18.5%High 106 · 5.6%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
R‐salbutamol 0.5% topical cream vs placebo
Quality of life measure · people with discoid lupus erythematosus
Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
R‐salbutamol 0.5% topical cream vs placebo
Relapse · people with discoid lupus erythematosus
Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Fluocinonide 0.05% vs hydrocortisone 1%
At least 50% reduction in erythema · people with discoid lupus erythematosus
Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
R‐salbutamol 0.5% topical cream vs placebo
Adverse events of medication, leading to discontinuation or significant morbidity · people with discoid lupus erythematosus
Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 37 participantsModerate
Tacrolimus 0.1% cream vs placebo
Clearing or excellent improvement · people with discoid lupus erythematosus
Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Tacrolimus 0.1% cream vs placebo
At least 50% reduction in erythema · people with discoid lupus erythematosus
Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Tacrolimus 0.1% cream vs placebo
Quality of life measure · people with discoid lupus erythematosus
Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Tacrolimus 0.1% cream vs placebo
Relapse · people with discoid lupus erythematosus
Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Tacrolimus 0.1% cream vs placebo
Adverse events of medication, leading to discontinuation or significant morbidity · people with discoid lupus erythematosus
Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 14 participantsModerate
Fluocinonide 0.05% vs hydrocortisone 1%
Quality of life measure · people with discoid lupus erythematosus
Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Fluocinonide 0.05% vs hydrocortisone 1%
Relapse · people with discoid lupus erythematosus
Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Fluocinonide 0.05% vs hydrocortisone 1%
Adverse events of medication, leading to discontinuation or significant morbidity · people with discoid lupus erythematosus
Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 78 participantsModerate
Acitretin 50 mg daily vs hydroxychloroquine 400 mg daily
Clearing or excellent improvement (after 8 weeks of treatment) · people with discoid lupus erythematosus
Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 58 participantsLow
Acitretin 50 mg daily vs hydroxychloroquine 400 mg daily
At least 50% reduction in erythema (after 8 weeks of treatment) · people with discoid lupus erythematosus
Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 49 participantsLow
Acitretin 50 mg daily vs hydroxychloroquine 400 mg daily
Quality of life measure · people with discoid lupus erythematosus
Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Acitretin 50 mg daily vs hydroxychloroquine 400 mg daily
Relapse · people with discoid lupus erythematosus
Drugs for discoid lupus erythematosus (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Imiquimod vs vehicle
Short‐term clinical cure (up to 3 months after start of treatment) (completely cleared short term) · molluscum contagiosum
Interventions for cutaneous molluscum contagiosum (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.33 [0.92, 1.93]4 studies · 850 participantsModerate
Imiquimod vs vehicle
Medium‐term clinical cure (after 3 months and up to 6 months after start of treatment) (completely cleared medium term) · molluscum contagiosum
Interventions for cutaneous molluscum contagiosum (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.67, 1.14]2 studies · 702 participantsModerate
Imiquimod vs vehicle
Long‐term clinical cure (beyond 6 months after start of treatment) (completely cleared long term) · molluscum contagiosum
Interventions for cutaneous molluscum contagiosum (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.79, 1.17]2 studies · 702 participantsModerate
Imiquimod vs vehicle
Short‐term clinical improvement (up to 3 months after start of treatment) · molluscum contagiosum
Interventions for cutaneous molluscum contagiosum (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.14 [0.89, 1.47]4 studies · 850 participantsHigh
Imiquimod vs vehicle
Any adverse effect · molluscum contagiosum
Interventions for cutaneous molluscum contagiosum (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.88, 1.07]3 studies · 827 participantsHigh
Imiquimod vs vehicle
Application site reactions · molluscum contagiosum
Interventions for cutaneous molluscum contagiosum (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.41 [1.13, 1.77]3 studies · 827 participantsModerate
Imiquimod vs vehicle
Severe application site reactions · molluscum contagiosum
Interventions for cutaneous molluscum contagiosum (2017) · Cochrane
RR 4.33 [1.16, 16.19]3 studies · 827 participantsModerate
Itraconazole (200 mg for 6 to 8 weeks) vs placebo
Percentage of lesions cured after the end of treatment · patients with Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis
Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Paromomycin ointment vs vehicle
Microbiological or histopathological cure of skin lesions · patients with Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis
Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.03 [0.88, 1.2]2 studies · 383 participantsVery low
Itraconazole (200 mg for 6 to 8 weeks) vs placebo
Percentage of participants with complete cure · patients with Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis
Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 3.7 [0.35, 38.99]3 studies · 244 participantsVery low
Itraconazole (200 mg for 6 to 8 weeks) vs placebo
Adverse effects Mild abdominal pain and nausea Adverse effects Mild abnormal liver function · patients with Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis
Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 2.36 [0.74, 7.47]3 studies · 204 participantsVery low
Itraconazole (200 mg for 6 to 8 weeks) vs placebo
Speed of healing (time taken to be 'cured') · patients with Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis
Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Itraconazole (200 mg for 6 to 8 weeks) vs placebo
Microbiological or histopathological cure of skin lesions · patients with Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis
Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 17 [0.47, 612.21]1 study · 20 participantsVery low
Paromomycin ointment vs vehicle
Percentage of lesions cured after the end of treatment · patients with Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis
Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Paromomycin ointment vs vehicle
Percentage of participants with complete cure · patients with Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis
Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.86, 1.17]2 studies · 383 participantsVery low
Paromomycin ointment vs vehicle
Adverse effects Skin/local reactions · patients with Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis
Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.42 [0.67, 3.01]4 studies · 713 participantsVery low
Paromomycin ointment vs vehicle
Speed of healing (time taken to be 'cured') · patients with Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis
Interventions for Old World cutaneous leishmaniasis (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Antibiotic prophylaxis vs no treatment/placebo
Recurrence of cellulitis · People with recurrent erysipelas or cellulitis
Interventions for the prevention of recurrent erysipelas and cellulitis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.31 [0.13, 0.72]5 studies · 513 participantsModerate
Antibiotic prophylaxis vs no treatment/placebo
Incidence rate of cellulitis · People with recurrent erysipelas or cellulitis
Interventions for the prevention of recurrent erysipelas and cellulitis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.44 [0.22, 0.89]4 studies · 473 participantsModerate
Antibiotic prophylaxis vs no treatment/placebo
Time to next episode of cellulitis · People with recurrent erysipelas or cellulitis
Interventions for the prevention of recurrent erysipelas and cellulitis (2017) · Cochrane
HR 0.51 [0.34, 0.78]3 studies · 437 participantsModerate
Antibiotic prophylaxis vs no treatment/placebo
Hospitalisation · People with recurrent erysipelas or cellulitis
Interventions for the prevention of recurrent erysipelas and cellulitis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.37, 1.57]3 studies · 429 participantsLow
Antibiotic prophylaxis vs no treatment/placebo
Any adverse reactions · People with recurrent erysipelas or cellulitis
Interventions for the prevention of recurrent erysipelas and cellulitis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.87 [0.58, 1.3]4 studies · 469 participantsLow
Antibiotic prophylaxis vs no treatment/placebo
Quality of life · People with recurrent erysipelas or cellulitis
Interventions for the prevention of recurrent erysipelas and cellulitis (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Azole vs terbinafine
Clinical cure · participants with confirmed toenail onychomycosis
Oral antifungal medication for toenail onychomycosis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.82 [0.72, 0.95]15 studies · 2168 participantsModerate
Terbinafine vs placebo
Quality of life · patients with confirmed toenail onychomycosis
Oral antifungal medication for toenail onychomycosis (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Azole vs placebo
Clinical cure · participants with confirmed toenail onychomycosis
Oral antifungal medication for toenail onychomycosis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 22.18 [12.63, 38.95]9 studies · 3440 participantsHigh
Azole vs placebo
Mycological cure · participants with confirmed toenail onychomycosis
Oral antifungal medication for toenail onychomycosis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 5.86 [3.23, 10.62]9 studies · 3440 participantsHigh
Azole vs placebo
Adverse events · participants with confirmed toenail onychomycosis
Oral antifungal medication for toenail onychomycosis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 1.04 [0.97, 1.12]9 studies · 3441 participantsModerate
Azole vs placebo
Recurrence rate · participants with confirmed toenail onychomycosis
Oral antifungal medication for toenail onychomycosis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.55 [0.29, 1.07]1 study · 26 participantsLow
Azole vs placebo
Quality of life · participants with confirmed toenail onychomycosis
Oral antifungal medication for toenail onychomycosis (2017) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Griseofulvin vs azole
Clinical cure · participants with confirmed toenail onychomycosis
Oral antifungal medication for toenail onychomycosis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.94 [0.45, 1.96]5 studies · 222 participantsModerate
Griseofulvin vs azole
Mycological cure · participants with confirmed toenail onychomycosis
Oral antifungal medication for toenail onychomycosis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 0.87 [0.5, 1.51]5 studies · 222 participantsModerate
Griseofulvin vs azole
Adverse events · participants with confirmed toenail onychomycosis
Oral antifungal medication for toenail onychomycosis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 2.41 [1.56, 3.73]2 studies · 143 participantsModerate
Griseofulvin vs azole
Recurrence rate · participants with confirmed toenail onychomycosis
Oral antifungal medication for toenail onychomycosis (2017) · Cochrane
RR 4 [0.26, 61.76]1 study · 7 participantsVery low