Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

426 questions · 433 findings · 18 reviews · Implants and prosthodontics

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 45 · 10.4%GRADE not reported 341 · 78.8%Very low 36 · 8.3%Low 6 · 1.4%Moderate 5 · 1.2%High 0 · 0%

Ultrasonic treatment or microwave disinfection device vs Another method, sham/placebo, or no treatment

Outcome not reported · Adults (over 18) wearing complete dentures (CD) or removable partial dentures (RPD)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for cleaning dentures in adults 2009 · Cochrane All outcomes
The effectiveness of ultrasonic or microwave devices as an intervention for routine use was not studied according to a randomised controlled trial design (Implications for research).
0 studies
No studies found

Vertical distraction osteogenesis vs Vertical GBR with non-resorbable barriers + particulate autogenous bone

Complication at augmentation + donor site · Patients with vertically deficient posterior/anterior mandibular ridges needing implants

Vertical distraction osteogenesis showed no clear difference in complication at augmentation + donor site compared with vertical GBR with non-resorbable barriers + particulate autogenous…; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant… 2009 · Cochrane All outcomes
Up to 3 years post-loading
OR 0.3 [0.04, 2.11]
1 study · 21 participants
GRADE not reported

Lingualised teeth (maxillary anatomic + mandibular non-anatomic; lingualised occlusion scheme) vs Zero-degree teeth (non-anatomic, cuspless)

Number of denture adjustments required · Edentulous adult patients requiring complete dentures

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: denture chewing surface designs in edentulous people 2005 · Cochrane All outcomes
3 weeks per denture set (cross-over)
No statistically significant difference was found between the two occlusal patterns with regard to the number of adjustments required.
1 study · 30 participants
GRADE not reported

Lingualised teeth (maxillary anatomic + mandibular non-anatomic; lingualised occlusion scheme) vs Zero-degree teeth (non-anatomic, cuspless)

Patient perceived chewing efficiency · Edentulous adult patients requiring complete dentures

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: denture chewing surface designs in edentulous people 2005 · Cochrane All outcomes
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Lingualised teeth (maxillary anatomic + mandibular non-anatomic; lingualised occlusion scheme) vs Zero-degree teeth (non-anatomic, cuspless)

Patient perceived satisfaction (denture preference) · Edentulous adult patients requiring complete dentures

Lingualised teeth (maxillary anatomic + mandibular non-anatomic;… led to higher patient perceived satisfaction (denture preference) compared with zero-degree teeth (non-anatomic, cuspless); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: denture chewing surface designs in edentulous people 2005 · Cochrane All outcomes
3 weeks per denture set (cross-over)
OR 10 [2.04, 48.96]
1 study · 30 participants
GRADE not reported

Lingualised teeth (maxillary anatomic + mandibular non-anatomic; lingualised occlusion scheme) vs Zero-degree teeth (non-anatomic, cuspless)

Patient perceived chewing function · Edentulous adult patients requiring complete dentures

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for replacing missing teeth: denture chewing surface designs in edentulous people 2005 · Cochrane All outcomes
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found