Question · asked by 1 review
Lingualised teeth (maxillary anatomic + mandibular non-anatomic; lingualised occlusion scheme) vs Zero-degree teeth (non-anatomic, cuspless): Patient perceived chewing function
- Population
- Edentulous adult patients requiring complete dentures
- Intervention
- Lingualised teeth (maxillary anatomic + mandibular non-anatomic; lingualised occlusion scheme)
- Comparison
- Zero-degree teeth (non-anatomic, cuspless)
- Outcome
- Patient perceived chewing function
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Lingualised teeth (maxillary anatomic + mandibular non-anatomic; lingualised occlusion scheme) vs Zero-degree teeth (non-anatomic, cuspless) Patient perceived masticatory/chewing function · Edentulous adult patients requiring complete dentures The review found no eligible studies for this question. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: denture chewing surface designs in edentulous people (2005) · Cochrane All outcomes | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Interventions for replacing missing teeth: denture chewing surface designs in edentulous people 2005 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2004-04 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.