Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,890 questions · 3,917 findings · 272 reviews · Oral Health

No studies found 429 · 11%GRADE not reported 2,657 · 67.8%Very low 512 · 13.1%Low 219 · 5.6%Moderate 80 · 2%High 20 · 0.5%

Altered-cast impression technique (ACIP), polyether vs One-piece cast technique (OPC), polyether

Operator-assessed gingival health of abutment · Partially edentulous people requiring a tooth- and tissue-supported (distal-extension) removable partial denture

It is very uncertain whether altered-cast impression technique (ACIP), polyether changes operator-assessed gingival health of abutment compared with one-piece cast technique (OPC), polyether (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Altered-cast impression technique (ACIP), polyether vs One-piece cast technique (OPC), polyether

Denture base adaptation (buccal shelf and ridge crest) · Partially edentulous people requiring a tooth- and tissue-supported (distal-extension) removable partial denture

Altered-cast impression technique (ACIP), polyether led to lower denture base adaptation (buccal shelf and ridge crest) compared with one-piece cast technique (OPC), polyether; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Altered-cast impression technique (ACIP), polyether vs One-piece cast technique (OPC), polyether

Number of intaglio adjustments · Partially edentulous people requiring a tooth- and tissue-supported (distal-extension) removable partial denture

It is very uncertain whether altered-cast impression technique (ACIP), polyether changes number of intaglio adjustments compared with one-piece cast technique (OPC), polyether (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Alginate (two stage-two step final/wash impression) vs Silicone elastomer (two stage-two step)

Participant-reported quality of the denture (comfort, stability, chewing efficiency) · Completely edentulous people
1 finding from 1 review

Altered-cast impression technique (ACIP), polyether vs One-piece cast technique (OPC), polyether

Abutment mobility · Partially edentulous people requiring a tooth- and tissue-supported (distal-extension) removable partial denture

It is very uncertain whether altered-cast impression technique (ACIP), polyether changes abutment mobility compared with one-piece cast technique (OPC), polyether (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Alginate (two stage-two step final/wash impression) vs Silicone elastomer (two stage-two step)

Oral health-related quality of life · Completely edentulous people

Alginate (two stage-two step final/wash impression) may leads to higher participant-reported oral health-related quality of life… compared with silicone elastomer (two stage-two step) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Altered-cast impression technique (ACIP), polyether vs One-piece cast technique (OPC), polyether

Participant-reported quality of the denture (general satisfaction) · Partially edentulous people requiring a tooth- and tissue-supported (distal-extension) removable partial denture
1 finding from 1 review

Single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) vs Two stage-two step zinc-oxide eugenol (ZoE) traditional method

Participant-reported quality of the denture (general satisfaction) · Completely edentulous people

It is very uncertain whether single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) changes participant-reported quality of the denture (general satisfaction) compared with two stage-two step zinc-oxide eugenol (ZoE) traditional method (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) vs Two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether) conventional method

Operator-assessed quality of the denture · Completely edentulous people
1 finding from 1 review

Single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) vs Two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether) conventional method

Participant-reported quality of the denture (general satisfaction) · Completely edentulous people

It is very uncertain whether single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) changes participant-reported quality of the denture (general satisfaction,… compared with two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether)… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) vs Two stage-two step zinc-oxide eugenol (ZoE) traditional method

Oral health-related quality of life · Completely edentulous people

It is very uncertain whether single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) changes participant-reported oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-EDENT) compared with two stage-two step zinc-oxide eugenol (ZoE) traditional method (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) vs Two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether) conventional method

Mandibular denture satisfaction · Completely edentulous people

It is very uncertain whether single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) changes mandibular denture satisfaction compared with two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether)… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) vs Two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether) conventional method

Maxillary denture satisfaction · Completely edentulous people

It is very uncertain whether single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) changes maxillary denture satisfaction compared with two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether)… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) vs Two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether) conventional method

Oral health-related quality of life · Completely edentulous people

It is very uncertain whether single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) changes participant-reported oral health-related quality of life (OHIP-EDENT) compared with two stage-two step elastomer (silicone, polysulfide, or polyether)… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Single-stage alginate impression (simplified method) vs Two stage-two step zinc-oxide eugenol (ZoE) traditional method

Operator-assessed quality of the denture (retention and stability) · Completely edentulous people
1 finding from 1 review

Preprosthetic surgery for a conventional denture (PPS) vs Implant retained overdenture (dental implants) (IRO)

Dissatisfied with eating with denture · Edentulous patients requiring improved denture retention

Preprosthetic surgery for a conventional denture (PPS) showed no clear difference in dissatisfied with eating with denture compared with implant retained overdenture (dental implants) (IRO); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Preprosthetic surgery for a conventional denture (PPS) vs Implant retained overdenture (dental implants) (IRO)

Dissatisfied with appearance of denture · Edentulous patients requiring improved denture retention

Preprosthetic surgery for a conventional denture (PPS) showed no clear difference in dissatisfied with appearance of denture compared with implant retained overdenture (dental implants) (IRO); GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review