Question · asked by 1 review
Alginate (two stage-two step final/wash impression) vs Silicone elastomer (two stage-two step): Participant-reported quality of the denture (comfort, stability, chewing efficiency)
- Population
- Completely edentulous people
- Intervention
- Alginate (two stage-two step final/wash impression)
- Comparison
- Silicone elastomer (two stage-two step)
- Outcome
- Participant-reported quality of the denture (comfort, stability, chewing efficiency)
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Alginate (two stage-two step final/wash impression) vs Silicone elastomer (two stage-two step) Participant-reported quality of the denture (comfort, stability, chewing efficiency) · Completely edentulous people · 2 weeks Final‐impression techniques and materials for making complete and removable partial dentures (2018) · Cochrane All outcomes | The study reported that there was no difference between groups for comfort, but that more participants reported better stability and chewing efficiency with silicone. Data were not amenable to analysis. | 1 study | GRADE not reported |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Final‐impression techniques and materials for making complete and removable partial dentures 2018 · Cochrane All outcomes | 2017-11 | Not listed | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.