Question · asked by 1 review

Altered-cast impression technique (ACIP), polyether vs One-piece cast technique (OPC), polyether: Participant-reported quality of the denture (general satisfaction)

Population
Partially edentulous people requiring a tooth- and tissue-supported (distal-extension) removable partial denture
Intervention
Altered-cast impression technique (ACIP), polyether
Comparison
One-piece cast technique (OPC), polyether
Outcome
Participant-reported quality of the denture (general satisfaction)

What each review found

Include earlier review versions
FindingEffectStudiesGRADE certainty
Altered-cast impression technique (ACIP), polyether vs One-piece cast technique (OPC), polyether
Participant-reported quality of the denture (general satisfaction) · Partially edentulous people requiring a tooth- and tissue-supported (distal-extension) removable partial denture · 1 year
Final‐impression techniques and materials for making complete and removable partial dentures (2018) · Cochrane All outcomes
The study reported that 50 of 57 participants were moderately to completely satisfied, with no significant difference between the groups. Data not reported separately for each group.1 study · 57 participantsLow

Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.

The reviews

ReviewSearched up toIncluded studiesAMSTAR 2
Final‐impression techniques and materials for making complete and removable partial dentures
2018 · Cochrane All outcomes
2017-11Not listedNot assessed
How reviews are matched to this question

Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.