Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

1,718 questions · 1,762 findings · 100 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 507 · 28.8%GRADE not reported 115 · 6.5%Very low 556 · 31.6%Low 444 · 25.2%Moderate 114 · 6.5%High 26 · 1.5%

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch vs usual care

Heart rate · neonates with mechanical ventilation

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in heart rate compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch vs usual care

SaO 2 during endotracheal suctioning · neonates with mechanical ventilation

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in saO 2 during endotracheal suctioning compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch vs usual care

SDB during endotracheal suctioning · neonates with mechanical ventilation

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch showed no clear difference in SDB during endotracheal suctioning compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch vs usual care

SRB during endotracheal suctioning · neonates with mechanical ventilation

Facilitated tucking / four‐handed care / gentle human touch may leads to higher SRB during endotracheal suctioning compared with standard care (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review