Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,072 questions · 4,237 findings · 447 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 946 · 22.3%GRADE not reported 257 · 6.1%Very low 1,121 · 26.5%Low 1,207 · 28.5%Moderate 568 · 13.4%High 138 · 3.3%

Maintenance anaesthesia: inhalational vs intravenous

Nausea and vomiting ‐ subgroup analysis: thiopentone or halothane + N2O versus propofol or propofol + N2O · paediatric

Maintenance anaesthesia: inhalational may leads to higher nausea and vomiting ‐ subgroup analysis: thiopentone or halothane +… compared with intravenous (low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Lymph node mets analysis ‐ N+ OS · patients with resectable gastric cancer

The intervention probably leads to lower lymph node mets analysis ‐ N+ OS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Chemobased OS ‐ 5‐FU based chemotherapy OS · patients with resectable gastric cancer

The intervention probably leads to lower chemobased OS ‐ 5‐FU based chemotherapy OS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Chemobased OS ‐ Platinum‐based chemotherapy OS · patients with resectable gastric cancer

The intervention showed no clear difference in chemobased OS ‐ Platinum‐based chemotherapy OS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Chemobased DFS ‐ 5‐FU based chemotherapy DFS · patients with resectable gastric cancer

The intervention probably leads to lower chemobased DFS ‐ 5‐FU based chemotherapy DFS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Chemobased DFS ‐ Platinum‐based chemotherapy DFS · patients with resectable gastric cancer

The intervention showed no clear difference in chemobased DFS ‐ Platinum‐based chemotherapy DFS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Stage OS analysis ‐ T1/2 OS · patients with resectable gastric cancer

The intervention showed no clear difference in stage OS analysis ‐ T1/2 OS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Stage OS analysis ‐ T3/4 OS · patients with resectable gastric cancer

The intervention showed no clear difference in stage OS analysis ‐ T3/4 OS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Lymph node mets analysis ‐ N‐ OS · patients with resectable gastric cancer

The intervention showed no clear difference in lymph node mets analysis ‐ N‐ OS (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Poor visual outcome (best‐corrected visual acuity worse than 6/60) · people with age‐related cataract

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes poor visual outcome (best‐corrected visual acuity worse than 6/60) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review