Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,112 questions in 171 reviews · Eyes and Vision

current versions
No studies 587 · 27.8%Ungraded 95 · 4.5%Very low 446 · 21.1%Low 557 · 26.4%Moderate 361 · 17.1%High 66 · 3.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Anti‐VEGF vs steroid
Adverse outcomes at any time point · people with BRVO
Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.12 [0.04, 0.32]3 studies · 551 participantsModerate
Anti‐VEGF vs steroid
Mean change in quality of life at 12 months on the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire‐25 (VFQ‐25) (scored 0 to 100) (higher score is better quality of life) · people with BRVO
Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 307 participantsModerate
Anti‐VEGF vs sham
Mean change in visual acuity letters at 6 months · macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion
Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 282 participantsModerate
Anti‐VEGF vs sham
Mean central retinal thickness (CRT) change at 6 months in microns (lower value is better) · macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion
Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 281 participantsModerate
Anti‐VEGF vs sham
Adverse outcomes at any time point · macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion
Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.98 [0.09, 10.66]1 study · 283 participantsVery low
Anti‐VEGF vs sham
Mean change in quality of life (QoL) at 12 months on the National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire‐25 (VFQ‐25) (scored 0 to 100) (higher score is better quality of life) · macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion
Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 281 participantsModerate
Anti‐VEGF vs laser
Gain of 15 letters or more of visual acuity · people with BRVO
Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (2020) · Cochrane
RR 2.09 [1.44, 3.05]2 studies · 201 participantsModerate
Anti‐VEGF vs laser
Mean change in visual acuity letters · people with BRVO
Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 473 participantsModerate
Anti‐VEGF vs laser
Mean central retinal thickness (CRT) change at 6 months in microns (lower value is better) · people with BRVO
Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 201 participantsModerate
Anti‐VEGF vs laser
Adverse outcomes at any time point · people with BRVO
Anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor for macular oedema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion (2020) · Cochrane
RR 2.97 [0.12, 71.89]2 studies · 456 participantsVery low
As needed vs monthly injections
Change in BCVA at 1 year (ETDRS letters score, the higher the score the better) · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Treatment regimens for administration of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 2299 participantsModerate
Extended‐fixed vs monthly injections
Change in central retinal thickness at 1 year (μm, the thinner the better on average) · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Treatment regimens for administration of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 1439 participantsLow
Extended‐fixed vs monthly injections
Change in QoL score at 1 year ( · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Treatment regimens for administration of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 1220 participantsModerate
Extended‐fixed vs monthly injections
Number of injections at 1 year · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Treatment regimens for administration of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular… (2020) · Cochrane
81 study · 1220 participantsUngraded
Extended‐fixed vs monthly injections
Cost of treatment per person at 1 year · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Treatment regimens for administration of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Extended‐fixed vs monthly injections
Endophthalmitis (ocular adverse event) · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Treatment regimens for administration of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular… (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.19 [0.03, 1.12]3 studies · 1132 participantsLow
As needed vs monthly injections
Gain of ≥ 15 letters visual acuity at 1 year · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Treatment regimens for administration of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular… (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.87 [0.76, 0.99]4 studies · 2299 participantsLow
As needed vs monthly injections
Change in central retinal thickness at 1 year (μm, the thinner the better on average) · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Treatment regimens for administration of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 2215 participantsModerate
As needed vs monthly injections
Change in QoL scores at 1 year (higher was better) · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Treatment regimens for administration of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 498 participantsLow
As needed vs monthly injections
Number of injections at 1 year · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Treatment regimens for administration of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 2336 participantsModerate
As needed vs monthly injections
Cost of treatment per person at 1 year · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Treatment regimens for administration of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 1105 participantsLow
As needed vs monthly injections
Endophthalmitis (ocular adverse event) · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Treatment regimens for administration of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular… (2020) · Cochrane
Peto OR 0.13 [0.04, 0.46]6 studies · 3175 participantsModerate
Extended‐fixed vs monthly injections
Change in BCVA at 1 year (ETDRS letters score, the higher the score the better) · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Treatment regimens for administration of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular… (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 1439 participantsModerate
Extended‐fixed vs monthly injections
Gain of ≥ 15 letters visual acuity at 1 year · people with neovascular age‐related macular degeneration
Treatment regimens for administration of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular… (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.94 [0.8, 1.1]3 studies · 1441 participantsModerate
Mitomycin C dacryocystorhinostomy vs dacryocystorhinostomy alone
Functional success, defined as the relief of epiphora · nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Antimetabolites as an adjunct to dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.12 [0.98, 1.29]7 studies · 356 participantsLow
Mitomycin C dacryocystorhinostomy vs dacryocystorhinostomy alone
Functional success, defined as the relief of epiphora · nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Antimetabolites as an adjunct to dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.15 [1.07, 1.25]14 studies · 909 participantsModerate
Mitomycin C dacryocystorhinostomy vs dacryocystorhinostomy alone
Anatomic success, defined as patency to lacrimal irrigation · nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Antimetabolites as an adjunct to dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.95, 1.11]4 studies · 306 participantsLow
Mitomycin C dacryocystorhinostomy vs dacryocystorhinostomy alone
Anatomic success, defined as patency to lacrimal irrigation · nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Antimetabolites as an adjunct to dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.09 [1.04, 1.15]12 studies · 831 participantsModerate
Mitomycin C dacryocystorhinostomy vs dacryocystorhinostomy alone
Ostium size on nasal endoscopy · nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Antimetabolites as an adjunct to dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (2020) · Cochrane
mean difference 3.72 studies · 65 participantsLow
Mitomycin C dacryocystorhinostomy vs dacryocystorhinostomy alone
Ostium size on nasal endoscopy at · nasolacrimal duct obstruction
Antimetabolites as an adjunct to dacryocystorhinostomy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (2020) · Cochrane
MD 1.42 studies · 100 participantsLow
Wavefront procedures vs conventional procedures
Proportion of eyes with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better post‐treatment:12 months ‐ Procedure: PRK · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.03 [0.86, 1.24]1 study · 70 participantsLow
Wavefront‐optimized procedures vs wavefront‐guided procedures
Proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 diopters (D) of target refraction post‐treatment:12 months ‐ overall estimate · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.95, 1.09]4 studies · 480 participantsLow
Wavefront‐optimized procedures vs wavefront‐guided procedures
Mean refractive error expressed as mean spherical equivalent post‐treatment:12 months ‐ Procedure PRK · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 334 participantsLow
Wavefront‐optimized procedures vs wavefront‐guided procedures
Mean refractive error expressed as mean spherical equivalent post‐treatment:12 months ‐ Procedure LASIK · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 472 participantsLow
Wavefront‐optimized procedures vs wavefront‐guided procedures
Mean higher‐order aberrations (HOAs) post‐treatment, measured by machine with wavefront sensor: 12 months ‐ overall estimate · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 622 participantsLow
Wavefront‐optimized procedures vs wavefront‐guided procedures
Proportion of eyes with significant visual loss (loss of 2 or more lines from pretreatment BSCVA): 12 months · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Wavefront‐guided LASIK vs wavefront‐guided PRK
Proportion of eyes with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better post‐treatment. ‐ 12 months · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.03 [0.93, 1.15]1 study · 66 participantsVery low
Wavefront‐guided LASIK vs wavefront‐guided PRK
Proportion of eyes that had lost 1 or more lines of best spectacle‐corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) posttreatment. ‐ 12 months · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.03 [0.93, 1.15]1 study · 66 participantsVery low
Wavefront‐guided LASIK vs wavefront‐guided PRK
Proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 diopters (D) of target refraction post‐treatment. ‐ 12 months · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.82, 1.14]1 study · 66 participantsVery low
Wavefront‐guided LASIK vs wavefront‐guided PRK
Mean refractive error expressed as mean spherical equivalent post‐treatment. ‐ 12 months · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 66 participantsVery low
Wavefront‐guided LASIK vs wavefront‐guided PRK
Mean higher‐order aberrations (HOAs) post‐treatment, measured by machine with wavefront sensor ‐ 12 months · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 66 participantsVery low
Wavefront procedures vs conventional procedures
Proportion of eyes with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better post‐treatment:12 months ‐ Procedure: LASIK · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Wavefront‐guided LASIK vs wavefront‐guided PRK
Proportion of eyes with significant visual loss (loss of 2 or more lines from pretreatment BSCVA): 12 months · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Wavefront‐guided LASIK vs wavefront‐guided PRK
Proportion of eyes with optical side effects, such as glare and halo: 12 months · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Wavefront procedures vs conventional procedures
Proportion of eyes that had lost 1 or more lines of best spectacle‐corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) posttreatment:12 months ‐ Procedure PRK · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
RR 0.94 [0.81, 1.09]1 study · 70 participantsLow
Wavefront procedures vs conventional procedures
Proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 diopters (D) of target refraction: 12 months ‐ Procedure PRK · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1.03 [0.86, 1.24]1 study · 70 participantsLow
Wavefront procedures vs conventional procedures
Proportion of eyes within ± 0.50 diopters (D) of target refraction: 12 months ‐ Procedure LASIK · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Wavefront procedures vs conventional procedures
Mean refractive error expressed as mean spherical equivalent post‐treatment:12 months ‐ Procedure PRK · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 70 participantsVery low
Wavefront procedures vs conventional procedures
Proportion of eyes that had lost 1 or more lines of best spectacle‐corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) posttreatment‐procedure LASIK; Mean higher‐order aberrations (HOAs) post‐treatment, measured by machine with wavefront sensor; proportion of eyes wi... · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Wavefront‐optimized procedures vs wavefront‐guided procedures
Proportion of eyes with uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) of 20/20 or better post‐treatment:12 months ‐ overall estimate · Adults with refractive errors
Wavefront excimer laser refractive surgery for adults with refractive errors (2020) · Cochrane
RR 1 [0.99, 1.02]5 studies · 618 participantsLow