Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,463 questions in 125 reviews · Anaesthesia

current versions
No studies 197 · 13.5%Ungraded 203 · 13.9%Very low 307 · 21%Low 441 · 30.1%Moderate 245 · 16.7%High 70 · 4.8%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Protocol using standard measures such as CVP vs usual care
Adverse outcomes ‐ all · patients with perioperative fluid optimization
Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.53 [0.26, 1.08]1 study · 60 participantsLow
Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs protocol using standard measures such
Medically fit for discharge · patients with proximal femoral fracture
Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 90 participantsLow
Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs protocol using standard measures such
Return to pre‐fracture accommodation/return to pre‐fracture mobility · patients with proximal femoral fracture
Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs protocol using standard measures such
Adverse outcomes ‐ cardiopulmonary · patients with proximal femoral fracture
Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs protocol using standard measures such
Adverse outcomes ‐ neurological · patients with proximal femoral fracture
Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs protocol using standard measures such
Adverse outcomes ‐ all · patients with proximal femoral fracture
Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.9 [0.37, 2.18]3 studies · 280 participantsVery low
Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs usual care
All‐cause mortality · patients with perioperative fluid optimization
Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.45 [0.07, 2.95]3 studies · 213 participantsLow
Advanced haemodynamic monitoring vs usual care
Total length of hospital stay · patients with perioperative fluid optimization
Perioperative fluid volume optimization following proximal femoral fracture (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 175 participantsLow
Low‐dose opioid‐based GA vs high‐dose opioid‐based GA
Mortality ‐ Death at any time after surgery · adult cardiac surgical patients
Fast‐track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.53 [0.25, 1.12]8 studies · 1994 participantsLow
Time‐directed extubation protocol vs usual care
Postoperative stroke · adult cardiac surgical patients
Fast‐track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.85 [0.33, 2.16]11 studies · 1646 participantsLow
Time‐directed extubation protocol vs usual care
Postoperative reintubation · adult cardiac surgical patients
Fast‐track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.34 [0.74, 2.41]12 studies · 1261 participantsLow
Time‐directed extubation protocol vs usual care
Time to extubation (hours) · adult cardiac surgical patients
Fast‐track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted16 studies · 2024 participantsLow
Time‐directed extubation protocol vs usual care
Length of intensive care unit stay (hours) · adult cardiac surgical patients
Fast‐track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted13 studies · 1888 participantsLow
Time‐directed extubation protocol vs usual care
Length of hospital stay (days) · adult cardiac surgical patients
Fast‐track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 1334 participantsLow
Low‐dose opioid‐based GA vs high‐dose opioid‐based GA
Postoperative myocardial infarction · adult cardiac surgical patients
Fast‐track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.98 [0.48, 1.99]8 studies · 1683 participantsLow
Low‐dose opioid‐based GA vs high‐dose opioid‐based GA
Postoperative stroke · adult cardiac surgical patients
Fast‐track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.17 [0.36, 3.78]5 studies · 562 participantsLow
Low‐dose opioid‐based GA vs high‐dose opioid‐based GA
Postoperative tracheal reintubation · adult cardiac surgical patients
Fast‐track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.77 [0.38, 8.27]5 studies · 594 participantsLow
Low‐dose opioid‐based GA vs high‐dose opioid‐based GA
Time to extubation (hours) · adult cardiac surgical patients
Fast‐track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted14 studies · 2486 participantsLow
Low‐dose opioid‐based GA vs high‐dose opioid‐based GA
Length of intensive care unit stay (hours) · adult cardiac surgical patients
Fast‐track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted12 studies · 1394 participantsLow
Low‐dose opioid‐based GA vs high‐dose opioid‐based GA
Length of hospital stay (days) · adult cardiac surgical patients
Fast‐track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 913 participantsLow
Time‐directed extubation protocol vs usual care
Mortality ‐ Death at any time after surgery · adult cardiac surgical patients
Fast‐track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.8 [0.45, 1.45]10 studies · 1802 participantsLow
Time‐directed extubation protocol vs usual care
Postoperative myocardial infarction · adult cardiac surgical patients
Fast‐track cardiac care for adult cardiac surgical patients (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.59 [0.27, 1.31]8 studies · 1378 participantsLow
Double vs single‐injection technique
Primary anaesthesia failure (incomplete sensory block) · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.55 [0.34, 0.89]9 studies · 527 participantsHigh
Multiple vs single‐injection technique
Secondary analgesia failure ‐ tourniquet pain · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.97 [0.3, 3.11]4 studies · 379 participantsHigh
Multiple vs single‐injection technique
Complete failure of block1 · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.31 [0.03, 2.71]7 studies · 484 participantsModerate
Multiple vs single‐injection technique
Time to readiness for surgery (minutes) · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 206 participantsLow
Multiple vs single‐injection technique
Intravascular injection · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.35 [0.2, 9.06]4 studies · 352 participantsModerate
Multiple vs single‐injection technique
Adverse effects lasting more than 24 hours5 · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 244 participantsLow
Multiple vs double‐injection technique
Primary anaesthesia failure · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.27 [0.19, 0.39]12 studies · 966 participantsHigh
Multiple vs double‐injection technique
Secondary analgesia failure ‐ intraoperative sedation required · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.75 [0.55, 1.03]7 studies · 716 participantsHigh
Multiple vs double‐injection technique
Secondary analgesia failure ‐ tourniquet pain · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.53 [0.33, 0.84]7 studies · 719 participantsHigh
Multiple vs double‐injection technique
Complete failure of block1 · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.24 [0.04, 1.41]9 studies · 630 participantsLow
Multiple vs double‐injection technique
Time to readiness for surgery4 · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 524 participantsModerate
Double vs single‐injection technique
Secondary analgesia failure ‐ intraoperative sedation required · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.64 [0.31, 1.31]2 studies · 129 participantsModerate
Multiple vs double‐injection technique
Intravascular injection · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.69 [0.32, 1.49]7 studies · 676 participantsModerate
Multiple vs double‐injection technique
Adverse effects lasting more than 24 hours5 · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 510 participantsLow
Double vs single‐injection technique
Secondary analgesia failure ‐ tourniquet pain · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.58 [0.22, 1.52]2 studies · 104 participantsModerate
Double vs single‐injection technique
Complete failure of block3 · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.29 [0.33, 5.01]7 studies · 368 participantsLow
Double vs single‐injection technique
Time to readiness for surgery4 · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Double vs single‐injection technique
Intravascular injection · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 4.15 [0.46, 37.13]2 studies · 90 participantsLow
Double vs single‐injection technique
Adverse effects lasting more than 24 hours5 · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 119 participantsLow
Multiple vs single‐injection technique
Primary anaesthesia failure · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.25 [0.14, 0.42]9 studies · 712 participantsHigh
Multiple vs single‐injection technique
Secondary analgesia failure ‐ intraoperative sedation required · adult patients undergoing hand, wrist or forearm surgery
Single, double or multiple‐injection techniques for non‐ultrasound guided axillary brachial plexus block in… (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.7 [0.41, 1.19]5 studies · 482 participantsHigh
Epidural pain relief vs systemic opioid‐based pain relief
Mortality in hospital or up to 30 days · people undergoing abdominal aortic surgery
Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid‐based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery (2016) · Cochrane
RR 1.06 [0.6, 1.86]14 studies · 1383 participantsLow
Epidural pain relief vs systemic opioid‐based pain relief
Myocardial infarction · people undergoing abdominal aortic surgery
Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid‐based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.54 [0.3, 0.97]7 studies · 851 participantsModerate
Epidural pain relief vs systemic opioid‐based pain relief
Tracheal intubation duration · people undergoing abdominal aortic surgery
Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid‐based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 975 participantsLow
Epidural pain relief vs systemic opioid‐based pain relief
Respiratory failure · people undergoing abdominal aortic surgery
Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid‐based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery (2016) · Cochrane
RR 0.69 [0.56, 0.85]6 studies · 861 participantsModerate
Epidural pain relief vs systemic opioid‐based pain relief
Gastrointestinal bleeding · people undergoing abdominal aortic surgery
Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid‐based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery (2016) · Cochrane
OR 0.2 [0.06, 0.65]4 studies · 487 participantsHigh
Epidural pain relief vs systemic opioid‐based pain relief
Pain (VAS scores) on movement at postoperative day 1 Scale from: 0 to 10. · people undergoing abdominal aortic surgery
Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid‐based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 162 participantsHigh
Epidural pain relief vs systemic opioid‐based pain relief
Intensive care unit length of stay · people undergoing abdominal aortic surgery
Epidural pain relief versus systemic opioid‐based pain relief for abdominal aortic surgery (2016) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 523 participantsModerate