Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

489 questions · 504 findings · 104 reviews

No studies found 32 · 6.3%GRADE not reported 63 · 12.5%Very low 152 · 30.2%Low 133 · 26.4%Moderate 103 · 20.4%High 21 · 4.2%

Delayed chemotherapy vs immediate chemotherapy

Toxicity – stomatitis · patients with asymptomatic, incurable, metastatic colorectal cancer

It is very uncertain whether delayed chemotherapy changes toxicity – stomatitis compared with immediate chemotherapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Delayed chemotherapy vs immediate chemotherapy

Toxicity – diarrhoea · patients with asymptomatic, incurable, metastatic colorectal cancer

It is very uncertain whether delayed chemotherapy changes toxicity – diarrhoea compared with immediate chemotherapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

TCu 220C vs Copper 7

Discontinuation due to pregnancy (750 days) · patients with Immediate insertion Post abortion

TCu 220C showed no clear difference in discontinuation due to pregnancy (750 days) compared with copper 7 (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

TCu 220C vs Copper 7

Discontinuation due to expulsion (750 days) · patients with Immediate insertion Post abortion

TCu 220C showed no clear difference in discontinuation due to expulsion (750 days) compared with copper 7 (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

TCu 220C vs Lippes Loop

Discontinuation due to perforation · patients with Immediate insertion Post abortion

TCu 220C showed no clear difference in discontinuation due to perforation (750 days) Tietze‐Potter gross… compared with lippes Loop (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

TCu 220C vs Lippes Loop

Discontinuation due to pelvic inflammation · patients with Immediate insertion Post abortion

TCu 220C showed no clear difference in discontinuation due to pelvic inflammatory disease (750 days) compared with lippes Loop (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

TCu 220C vs Lippes Loop

Discontinuation due to pregnancy (750 days) · patients with Immediate insertion Post abortion

TCu 220C probably leads to lower discontinuation rate due to pregnancy (750days) compared with lippes Loop (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

TCu 220C vs Lippes Loop

Discontinuation due to expulsion (750 days) · patients with Immediate insertion Post abortion

TCu 220C probably leads to lower discontinuation rate due to expulsion (750 days) Tietze‐Potter gross… compared with lippes Loop (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

CPR plus delayed defibrillation vs immediate defibrillation: overall analysis

Survival to hospital discharge · patients with out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest

CPR plus delayed defibrillation showed no clear difference in survival to hospital discharge rate compared with immediate defibrillation: overall analysis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

CPR plus delayed defibrillation vs immediate defibrillation: overall analysis

Neurological outcome at hospital discharge rate of good recovery · patients with out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest

CPR plus delayed defibrillation showed no clear difference in neurological outcome at hospital discharge rate of good recovery compared with immediate defibrillation: overall analysis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

CPR plus delayed defibrillation vs immediate defibrillation: overall analysis

ROSC rate · patients with out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest

CPR plus delayed defibrillation showed no clear difference in ROSC rate compared with immediate defibrillation: overall analysis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

CPR plus delayed defibrillation vs immediate defibrillation: overall analysis

Survival at 1 year rate · patients with out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest

CPR plus delayed defibrillation showed no clear difference in survival at 1 year rate compared with immediate defibrillation: overall analysis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bio-Oss (anorganic bovine bone) vs Bovine-derived xenograft (Bio-Oss) plus resorbable barrier

Bone gain (horizontal - HDD) · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites)

Bio-Oss (anorganic bovine bone) showed no clear difference in bone gain (horizontal - HDD) compared with bio-Oss + resorbable barrier; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Non-resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration) vs Resorbable barrier + particulate autogenous bone

Vertical bone gain · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites)

Non-resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration) showed no clear difference in bone gain (vertical - VDH) compared with resorbable barrier + autogenous bone; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

Non-resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration) vs Resorbable barrier + particulate autogenous bone

Bone gain (horizontal - HDD) · Patients receiving immediate single implants in fresh extraction sockets (maxillary anterior/premolar sites)

Non-resorbable barrier (guided bone regeneration) showed no clear difference in bone gain (horizontal - HDD) compared with resorbable barrier + autogenous bone; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review