Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

2,434 questions in 139 reviews · Kidney and Transplant

current versions
No studies 504 · 20.7%Ungraded 40 · 1.6%Very low 611 · 25.1%Low 790 · 32.5%Moderate 414 · 17%High 75 · 3.1%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Tonsillectomy plus standard care vs standard care
Kidney failure · people IgA nephropathy
Non‐immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Tonsillectomy plus standard care vs standard care
Remission of proteinuria · people IgA nephropathy
Non‐immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.9 [1.45, 2.47]2 studies · 143 participantsLow
Tonsillectomy plus standard care vs standard care
Remission of haematuria (microscopic) · people IgA nephropathy
Non‐immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.93 [1.47, 2.53]2 studies · 143 participantsLow
Tonsillectomy plus standard care vs standard care
Relapse of haematuria (macroscopic) · people IgA nephropathy
Non‐immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.33 [0.8, 2.23]1 study · 32 participantsVery low
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs placebo or no treatment
Kidney failure or doubling of SCr · people with IgA nephropathy
Non‐immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.25 [0.03, 2.21]1 study · 109 participantsLow
Tonsillectomy plus standard care vs standard care
Relapse of proteinuria · people IgA nephropathy
Non‐immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.7 [0.57, 0.85]1 study · 73 participantsLow
Tonsillectomy plus standard care vs standard care
> 50% increase in SCr · people IgA nephropathy
Non‐immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Tonsillectomy plus standard care vs standard care
Proteinuria · people IgA nephropathy
Non‐immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 69 participantsLow
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs placebo or no treatment
Remission of proteinuria: complete remission · people with IgA nephropathy
Non‐immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy (2024) · Cochrane
RR 5.29 [0.27, 102.49]1 study · 33 participantsLow
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs placebo or no treatment
Remission of haematuria · people with IgA nephropathy
Non‐immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs placebo or no treatment
Relapse of proteinuria · people with IgA nephropathy
Non‐immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs placebo or no treatment
> 50% increase in SCr · people with IgA nephropathy
Non‐immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs placebo or no treatment
Proteinuria · people with IgA nephropathy
Non‐immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 199 participantsModerate
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs other supportive care treatment
Death · people IgA nephropathy
Non‐immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs other supportive care treatment
Kidney failure · people IgA nephropathy
Non‐immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.2 [0.01, 3.88]1 study · 34 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Open vs laparoscopic
Analgesia requirements · live donor nephrectomy (primary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 556 participantsHigh
Summary of findings table ‐ Laparoscopic vs hand‐assisted
Analgesia requirements · live donor nephrectomy (primary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 270 participantsHigh
Summary of findings table ‐ Laparoscopic vs hand‐assisted
Duration of procedure · live donor nephrectomy (primary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 270 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Laparoscopic vs hand‐assisted
Blood loss · live donor nephrectomy (primary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 270 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Laparoscopic vs hand‐assisted
Perioperative Complications · live donor nephrectomy (primary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.32 [0.79, 2.22]3 studies · 270 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Laparoscopic vs hand‐assisted
Reoperations · live donor nephrectomy (primary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.61 [0.2, 12.81]3 studies · 270 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Laparoscopic vs hand‐assisted
Warm ischaemia time · live donor nephrectomy (primary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 270 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Laparoscopic vs hand‐assisted
Hospital stay · live donor nephrectomy (primary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 270 participantsHigh
Summary of findings table ‐ Open vs laparoscopic
Early graft loss · live donor nephrectomy (secondary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.36 [0.08, 1.74]4 studies · 356 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Open vs laparoscopic
Delayed graft function · live donor nephrectomy (secondary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.01 [0.51, 2.02]6 studies · 715 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Open vs laparoscopic
Acute rejection · live donor nephrectomy (secondary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.36 [0.86, 2.15]6 studies · 693 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Open vs laparoscopic
Duration of procedure · live donor nephrectomy (primary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 815 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Open vs laparoscopic
Ureteric complications · live donor nephrectomy (secondary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.58 [0.74, 3.36]6 studies · 775 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Open vs laparoscopic
Kidney function at one year · live donor nephrectomy (secondary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 538 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Open vs laparoscopic
One year graft loss · live donor nephrectomy (secondary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.86 [0.25, 2.96]3 studies · 403 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Laparoscopic vs hand‐assisted
Early graft loss ‐ not reported · live donor nephrectomy (secondary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Laparoscopic vs hand‐assisted
Delayed graft function ‐ not reported · live donor nephrectomy (secondary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Laparoscopic vs hand‐assisted
Acute rejection ‐ not reported · live donor nephrectomy (secondary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Laparoscopic vs hand‐assisted
Ureteric complications ‐ not reported · live donor nephrectomy (secondary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Laparoscopic vs hand‐assisted
Kidney function at one year ‐ not reported · live donor nephrectomy (secondary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Laparoscopic vs hand‐assisted
One‐year graft loss · live donor nephrectomy (secondary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.31 [0.51, 3.37]2 studies · 230 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Open vs laparoscopic
Blood loss · live donor nephrectomy (primary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 775 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Open vs laparoscopic
Perioperative complications: pre 2010 · live donor nephrectomy (primary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.66 [0.39, 1.11]4 studies · 464 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Open vs laparoscopic
Perioperative complications: post 2010 · live donor nephrectomy (primary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
RR 2.19 [1.53, 3.13]2 studies · 303 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Open vs laparoscopic
Perioperative complications: total · live donor nephrectomy (primary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.55, 1.89]6 studies · 767 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Open vs laparoscopic
Reoperations · live donor nephrectomy (primary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.57 [0.09, 3.64]6 studies · 596 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Open vs laparoscopic
Warm ischaemia time · live donor nephrectomy (primary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted7 studies · 815 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Open vs laparoscopic
Hospital stay · live donor nephrectomy (primary outcomes)
Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open nephrectomy for live kidney donors (2024) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted6 studies · 775 participantsModerate
Angiotensin‐converting‐enzyme inhibitors vs placebo or no treatment
All‐cause death Median · people with diabetes and kidney disease
Angiotensin‐converting‐enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for preventing the progression of… (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.91 [0.73, 1.15]24 studies · 7413 participantsLow
Angiotensin receptor blockers vs placebo or no treatment
Doubling of SCr Median · people with diabetes and kidney disease
Angiotensin‐converting‐enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for preventing the progression of… (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.84 [0.72, 0.97]4 studies · 3280 participantsLow
Angiotensin receptor blockers vs placebo or no treatment
Fatal or nonfatal stroke Median · people with diabetes and kidney disease
Angiotensin‐converting‐enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for preventing the progression of… (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.76 [0.32, 1.77]2 studies · 619 participantsLow
Angiotensin receptor blockers vs placebo or no treatment
Fatal or nonfatal myocardial infarction Median · people with diabetes and kidney disease
Angiotensin‐converting‐enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for preventing the progression of… (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.43 [0.11, 1.65]2 studies · 619 participantsLow
Angiotensin receptor blockers vs placebo or no treatment
Micro‐ to macroalbuminuria Median · people with diabetes and kidney disease
Angiotensin‐converting‐enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for preventing the progression of… (2024) · Cochrane
RR 0.44 [0.23, 0.85]5 studies · 815 participantsLow
Angiotensin receptor blockers vs placebo or no treatment
Micro‐ to normoalbuminuria Median · people with diabetes and kidney disease
Angiotensin‐converting‐enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for preventing the progression of… (2024) · Cochrane
RR 5.58 [0.85, 36.81]4 studies · 671 participantsVery low
Angiotensin receptor blockers vs angiotensin‐converting‐enzyme inhibitors
All‐cause death Median · people with diabetes and kidney disease
Angiotensin‐converting‐enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers for preventing the progression of… (2024) · Cochrane
RR 1.13 [0.68, 1.88]15 studies · 1739 participantsLow