Cochrane · systematic review · CD003962

Non‐immunosuppressive treatment for IgA nephropathy

Tunnicliffe, DJ, Reid, S, Craig, JC, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2024 · Cochrane Library

Kidney and TransplantAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
22
current version
GRADE rated
11
No studies
11
Included studies
NR
No studies 11 · 50%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 9.1%Low 7 · 31.8%Moderate 2 · 9.1%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition compared to placebo or no treatment for people with IgA nephropathy

Population: people with IgA nephropathy
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death (any cause)
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs placebo or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Kidney failure or doubling of SCr
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs placebo or no treatment
RR 0.25 [0.03, 2.21]1 study · 109 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Remission of proteinuria: complete remission
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs placebo or no treatment
RR 5.29 [0.27, 102.49]1 study · 33 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
Remission of haematuria
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs placebo or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Relapse of proteinuria
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs placebo or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
> 50% increase in SCr
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs placebo or no treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Proteinuria
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs placebo or no treatment
no estimate extracted4 studies · 199 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision

Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition compared to other supportive care treatment for IgA nephropathy

Population: people IgA nephropathy
7 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs other supportive care treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Kidney failure
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs other supportive care treatment
RR 0.2 [0.01, 3.88]1 study · 34 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Remission of proteinuria
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs other supportive care treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Remission of haematuria
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs other supportive care treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Relapse of proteinuria
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs other supportive care treatment
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
> 50% increase in SCr
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs other supportive care treatment
RR 0.23 [0.07, 0.7]1 study · 44 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision
Proteinuria
Renin‐angiotensin system inhibition vs other supportive care treatment
no estimate extracted3 studies · 168 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias

Tonsillectomy plus standard care compared to standard care for IgA nephropathy

Population: people IgA nephropathy
8 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Death (any cause)
Tonsillectomy plus standard care vs standard care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Kidney failure
Tonsillectomy plus standard care vs standard care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Remission of proteinuria
Tonsillectomy plus standard care vs standard care
RR 1.9 [1.45, 2.47]2 studies · 143 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Remission of haematuria (microscopic)
Tonsillectomy plus standard care vs standard care
RR 1.93 [1.47, 2.53]2 studies · 143 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
Relapse of haematuria (macroscopic)
Tonsillectomy plus standard care vs standard care
RR 1.33 [0.8, 2.23]1 study · 32 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Relapse of proteinuria
Tonsillectomy plus standard care vs standard care
RR 0.7 [0.57, 0.85]1 study · 73 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias
> 50% increase in SCr
Tonsillectomy plus standard care vs standard care
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Proteinuria
Tonsillectomy plus standard care vs standard care
no estimate extracted2 studies · 69 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias