Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

664 questions in 25 reviews · Endodontics and dental trauma

current versions
No studies 111 · 16.7%Ungraded 417 · 62.8%Very low 69 · 10.4%Low 50 · 7.5%Moderate 16 · 2.4%High 1 · 0.2%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Intervention NR
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Full pulpotomy, irreversible pulpitis
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.837 [0.741, 0.916]12 studiesUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
OR 2.41 [1.28, 4.51]7 studies · 377 participantsLow
Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs None (single-arm success proportion)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months, Hemostasis >=10 min
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.862NRUngraded
Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs None (single-arm success proportion)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months, Irreversible pulpitis
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.824 [0.746, 0.890]NRUngraded
Intervention NR
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Immature teeth, normal pulp/reversible pulpitis
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.892 [0.834, 0.940]2 studiesUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months, Irreversible pulpitis
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
OR 3.17 [1.25, 7.99]NRUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Biodentine
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
OR 0.89 [0.47, 1.69]6 studies · 348 participantsLow
Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs None (single-arm success proportion)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months, Unspecified/mixed diagnosis
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.909 [0.833, 0.965]NRUngraded
Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs None (single-arm success proportion)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months, Partial pulpotomy
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.882NRUngraded
Intervention NR
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Full pulpotomy, unspecified/mixed diagnosis
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.903 [0.801, 0.973]5 studiesUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs TotalFill BC
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
OR 1.44 [0.65, 3.19]2 studies · 248 participantsUngraded
Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs None (single-arm success proportion)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.867 [0.820, 0.907]25 studies · 2012 participantsVery low
Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Mature permanent teeth with irreversible pulpitis and carious pulp exposure (treated with full pulpotomy) · >=12 months
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
OR 1.67 [0.59, 4.72]2 studies · 70 participantsUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium-enriched mixture (CEM)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
OR 0.78 [0.46, 1.34]4 studies · 611 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Mature teeth, full pulpotomy, irreversible pulpitis
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.817 [0.702, 0.909]8 studiesUngraded
Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs None (single-arm success proportion)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · 24 months, 24-month follow-up
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.902NRUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
OR 1.02 [0.43, 2.43]3 studies · 109 participantsUngraded
Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs None (single-arm success proportion)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months, Mature teeth
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.838 [0.759, 0.904]NRUngraded
Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs None (single-arm success proportion)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months, Immature teeth
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.872 [0.803, 0.929]NRUngraded
Intervention NR
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Partial pulpotomy, irreversible pulpitis
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.826 [0.754, 0.889]6 studiesUngraded
Pulpotomy (full or partial) vs None (single-arm success proportion)
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure · >=12 months, Full pulpotomy
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.859NRUngraded
Intervention NR
Overall success (composite of clinical and radiographic success) · Mixed root maturation (both mature and immature teeth)
Efficacy of pulpotomy for permanent teeth with carious pulp exposure: A systematic review and meta-analysis… (2024)
Proportion 0.950 [0.859, 0.998]3 studiesUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Treated by prosthodontists
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 1.87 [0.84, 3.31]3834 participantsUngraded
Tooth location
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Kontakiotis et al. 2015 mandibular posterior
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 7.11 studyUngraded
Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) vs Calcium hydroxide (CH)
Clinical and radiographic success · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing pulpotomy · 1 to 2 years, Full or partial pulpotomy
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
OR 2.36 [0.47, 11.75]6 studies · 341 participantsLow
Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)
Clinical and radiographic success (composite) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in immature permanent teeth undergoing pulpotomy · ≥6 months follow-up
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
PRF vs MTA was investigated in 2 RCTs (Alawwad 2020; Keswani 2014) for the primary outcome; the two trials provided contradictory evidence and differed in risk of bias, so were not pooled. Weak evidence.2 studiesUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, PFM fabrication material
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 5.71 [0.12, 18.75]1980 participantsUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · >5-10 years, Follow-up >5-10 years
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 5.53 [3.74, 7.64]2443 participantsUngraded
Indirect restoration placement by undergraduate students vs None
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Undergraduate students
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 5.68 [3.17, 8.86]1604 participantsUngraded
Calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)
Clinical and radiographic success (composite) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing pulpotomy · ≥6 months follow-up
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
CEM vs MTA was investigated in 2 RCTs (Asgary 2017; Nosrat 2013) for the primary outcome; not pooled owing to heterogeneity. The per-trial forest plots (Figure 8) indicated MTA performed comparably to CEM. Weak evidence.2 studiesUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Temporization >2 weeks
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 4.25 [1.28, 8.85]2280 participantsUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · >10 years, Follow-up >10 years
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 6.74 [2.82, 12.18]3640 participantsUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Temporization ≤2 weeks
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 1.47 [0.81, 2.31]1907 participantsUngraded
Tooth location
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Cheung et al. 2005 mandibular anterior
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 01 studyUngraded
Pre-operative caries fillings or crowns vs Intact teeth
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Pre-operative caries fillings or crowns
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 131 studyUngraded
Pre-operative bone level < 35% vs Pre-operative bone level ≥ 35%
Periapical pathosis incidence · Vital teeth · Bone level < 35%
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 1.41 studyUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Radiographic pulp-status assessment
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 4.95 [2.43, 8.29]1853 participantsUngraded
Eugenol-based temporary cement vs Eugenol-free temporary cement
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Eugenol-based
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 3.34 [1.66, 5.58]7043 participantsUngraded
Tooth location
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Cheung et al. 2005 mandibular posterior
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 6.11 studyUngraded
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)
Dentin bridge formation · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing partial pulpotomy · ≥6 months follow-up
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
Four RCTs compared CH with MTA for dentin bridge formation (all used partial pulpotomy; all at low risk of bias except Qudeimat 2007). Apart from Wei 2010, trials yielded implausibly large ORs with very wide 95% CIs;…4 studiesUngraded
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)
Clinical and radiographic success (composite) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in immature permanent teeth · ≥6 months; follow-up range 1-2 years, Root maturation: immature
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
OR 2.22 [0.13, 36.67]2 studies · 106 participantsVery low
Calcium hydroxide (CH) vs Mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA)
Clinical and radiographic success (composite) · Patients with carious pulp exposure in permanent teeth undergoing direct pulp capping (DPC) · ≥6 months; follow-up range 1-3 years, Treatment performed: DPC
Comparative efficacy of materials used in patients undergoing pulpotomy or direct pulp capping in carious… (2023)
OR 3.10 [1.66, 5.79]4 studies · 559 participantsModerate
Pre-operative caries fillings or crowns vs Intact teeth
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Intact teeth
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 51 studyUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Polyvinyl siloxane impression material
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 3.17 [1.55, 5.34]636 participantsUngraded
Intervention NR
Pulp necrosis · Reversible hydrocolloid impression material
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 1.191 studyUngraded
Tooth location
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · Kontakiotis et al. 2015 maxillary anterior
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 9.41 studyUngraded
Glass ionomer (GIC) permanent cement vs Glass ionomer cement or zinc phosphate cement
Pulp necrosis incidence · Vital teeth · GIC
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 5.33 [2.56, 9.03]182 participantsUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Resin permanent cement
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 3.37 [1.90, 5.23]738 participantsUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · Follow-up ≤5 to >10 years, Eugenol-based temporary cement
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 3.34 [1.66, 5.58]7043 participantsUngraded
Indirect restorations (crowns, fixed partial dentures, inlays/onlays/veneers) vs None (single-group incidence)
Pulp necrosis · Vital teeth restored with indirect restorations · ≤5 years, Follow-up ≤5 years
Incidence and influential factors in pulp necrosis and periapical pathosis following indirect restorations:… (2023)
Proportion 3.53 [2.10, 5.31]5532 participantsUngraded