Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

36 questions · 36 findings · 6 reviews

No studies found 3 · 8.3%GRADE not reported 10 · 27.8%Very low 14 · 38.9%Low 2 · 5.6%Moderate 5 · 13.9%High 2 · 5.6%

Remote screening of the oral cavity (mobile application/telemedicine) vs Reference standard: examination and clinical evaluation by a physician/clinician with specialist knowledge or training (long-term follow-up accepted for those screened negative)

Specificity for detection of oral cavity cancer/OPMD · Apparently healthy adults not reporting symptoms of OPMD or OSCC, attending an organised screening or surveillance programme, or screened…
1 finding from 1 review

Remote screening of the oral cavity (mobile application/telemedicine) vs Reference standard: examination and clinical evaluation by a physician/clinician with specialist knowledge or training (long-term follow-up accepted for those screened negative)

Sensitivity for detection of oral cavity cancer/OPMD · Apparently healthy adults not reporting symptoms of OPMD or OSCC, attending an organised screening or surveillance programme, or screened…
1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Healthcare resource use and cost (ED and urgent care visits, outpatient visits, telephone calls, consultation time; no of eye examinations) · adults, adolescents and children with Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes
1 finding from 1 review