Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

34 questions · 34 findings · 8 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 6 · 17.6%Low 23 · 67.6%Moderate 3 · 8.8%High 2 · 5.9%

Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) vs another fish oil LE

Conjugated bilirubin levels · Parenterally fed preterm infants

1 finding from 1 review

Lipid emulsions for parenterally fed preterm infants 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 55 participants
Low

Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) vs non‐fish oil LE

PNALD/ cholestasis (any definition) MOFS‐LE vs S‐LE Pure F‐LE vs S‐LE · parenterally fed preterm infants with cholestasis

It is very uncertain whether fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) changes PNALD/ cholestasis (any definition) MOFS‐LE vs S‐LE Pure F‐LE vs S‐LE compared with non‐fish oil LE (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lipid emulsions for parenterally fed preterm infants 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.54 [0.32, 0.91]
2 studies · 40 participants
Very low

Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) vs non‐fish oil LE

Death of baby (up to discharge) · parenterally fed preterm infants with cholestasis

It is very uncertain whether fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) changes death before discharge – MOFS‐LE vs S‐LE – Pure F‐LE vs IL compared with non‐fish oil LE (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lipid emulsions for parenterally fed preterm infants 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.24 [0.03, 1.87]
2 studies · 40 participants
Very low

Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) vs non‐fish oil LE

Any sepsis – MOFS‐LE vs S‐LE – Pure F‐LE vs IL · parenterally fed preterm infants with cholestasis

It is very uncertain whether fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) changes any sepsis – MOFS‐LE vs S‐LE – Pure F‐LE vs IL compared with non‐fish oil LE (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lipid emulsions for parenterally fed preterm infants 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.21 [0.5, 2.92]
2 studies · 40 participants
Very low

Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) vs non‐fish oil LE

Conjugated bilirubin levels · parenterally fed preterm infants with cholestasis

1 finding from 1 review

Lipid emulsions for parenterally fed preterm infants 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 24 participants
Low

Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) vs non‐fish oil LE

Death of baby (up to discharge) · Parenterally fed preterm infants

Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) showed no clear difference in death before discharge – MOFS‐LE vs S‐LE compared with non‐fish oil LE (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lipid emulsions for parenterally fed preterm infants 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.24 [0.81, 1.9]
9 studies · 855 participants
Low

Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) vs non‐fish oil LE

Oxygen requirement at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age · Parenterally fed preterm infants

Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) showed no clear difference in CLD (oxygen requirement at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age) – MOFS‐LE vs… compared with non‐fish oil LE (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lipid emulsions for parenterally fed preterm infants 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1 [0.75, 1.34]
6 studies · 581 participants
Low

Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) vs non‐fish oil LE

Conjugated bilirubin levels · Parenterally fed preterm infants

1 finding from 1 review

Lipid emulsions for parenterally fed preterm infants 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
8 studies · 673 participants
Low

Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) vs non‐fish oil LE

Any sepsis (clinical and/or culture positive) · parenterally fed term and late preterm infants

It is very uncertain whether fish oil LE changes any sepsis (clinical or culture positive (or both)) MOFS‐LE vs S‐LE… compared with non‐fish oil LE (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lipid emulsions for parenterally fed term and late preterm infants 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.21 [0.5, 2.92]
2 studies · 40 participants
Very low

Fish oil lipid emulsion (LE) vs non‐fish oil LE

PNALD/ cholestasis (any definition) MOFS‐LE vs S‐LE Pure F‐LE vs S‐LE · parenterally fed term and late preterm infants

It is very uncertain whether fish oil LE changes PNALD/cholestasis (any definition) MOFS‐LE vs S‐LE Pure F‐LE vs S‐LE compared with non‐fish oil LE (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Lipid emulsions for parenterally fed term and late preterm infants 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.54 [0.32, 0.91]
2 studies · 40 participants
Very low

Moxibustion vs Western medicine

QoL · Patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy

Moxibustion may leads to higher qoL (Karnofsky score) compared with conventional medicines (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Moxibustion for alleviating side effects of chemotherapy or radiotherapy in people with cancer 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
MD 6.7 [2.37, 11.03]
1 study · 82 participants
Low

Yoga vs NON‐STANDARD CARE

Social functioning: clinically important change SOFS ‐ overall, not improved · patients with schizophrenia

YOGA showed no clear difference in social functioning: clinically important change SOFS ‐ overall, not… compared with NON‐STANDARD CARE (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Yoga versus non‐standard care for schizophrenia 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.9 [0.78, 1.04]
1 study · 84 participants
Low

Active cancer therapy combined with TCM vs active cancer therapy

Quality of life ‐ Karnofsky performance status Karnofsky status judged by clinicians. Scale: 0 to 100 · patients with oesophageal cancer

1 finding from 1 review

Chinese herbal medicine for oesophageal cancer 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 60 participants
Low

Yoga vs usual care

Social functioning · patients with schizophrenia

YOGA showed no clear difference in social functioning: Overall ‐ not improved SOFS compared with STANDARD CARE (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Yoga versus standard care for schizophrenia 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.88 [0.77, 1]
1 study · 83 participants
Moderate