Knee replacement with tourniquet vs knee replacement without tourniquet
Pain on movement at 24 hours Visual analogue scale Scale from zero to 10
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted8 studies · 577 participantsModerate
Findings
What do systematic reviews say?
866 questions · 900 findings · 80 reviews
No studies found 198 · 22%GRADE not reported 207 · 23%Very low 158 · 17.6%Low 211 · 23.4%Moderate 98 · 10.9%High 28 · 3.1%
Knee replacement with tourniquet vs knee replacement without tourniquet
Functional outcomes
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted5 studies · 611 participantsModerate
Knee replacement with tourniquet vs knee replacement without tourniquet
Global assessment of treatment success
Knee replacement with tourniquet showed no clear difference in global assessment of success Participants reporting overall… compared with knee replacement without tourniquet (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1 [0.91, 1.1]1 study · 100 participantsLow
Knee replacement with tourniquet vs knee replacement without tourniquet
Health‐related quality of life (mental)
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extracted1 study · 199 participantsLow
Knee replacement with tourniquet vs knee replacement without tourniquet
Serious adverse events
Knee replacement with tourniquet probably leads to higher serious adverse events compared with knee replacement without tourniquet (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1.73 [1.1, 2.73]21 studies · 1799 participantsModerate
Knee replacement with tourniquet vs knee replacement without tourniquet
Cognitive function
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- no estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Knee replacement with tourniquet vs knee replacement without tourniquet
Survival of the implant Risk of revision At 1 year
It is very uncertain whether knee replacement with tourniquet changes survival of the implant Risk of revision At 1 year compared with knee replacement without tourniquet (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- RR 1.44 [0.23, 8.92]3 studies · 214 participantsVery low
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) vs placebo or no intervention
All‐cause mortality · women with primary biliary cirrhosis.
It is very uncertain whether hormone replacement changes all‐cause mortality compared with placebo or no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Hormone replacement for osteoporosis in women with primary biliary cirrhosis 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRD 02 studies · 49 participantsVery low
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) vs placebo or no intervention
Fracture · women with primary biliary cirrhosis.
It is very uncertain whether hormone replacement changes fractures compared with placebo or no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Hormone replacement for osteoporosis in women with primary biliary cirrhosis 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted2 studies · 49 participantsVery low
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) vs placebo or no intervention
Adverse events · women with primary biliary cirrhosis.
It is very uncertain whether hormone replacement changes adverse events compared with placebo or no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Hormone replacement for osteoporosis in women with primary biliary cirrhosis 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 5.26 [1.26, 22.04]2 studies · 49 participantsVery low
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) vs placebo or no intervention
Mean change in BMD of the lumbar spine · women with primary biliary cirrhosis.
1 finding from 1 review
- Hormone replacement for osteoporosis in women with primary biliary cirrhosis 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted2 studies · 36 participantsVery low
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) vs placebo or no intervention
Change in % of proximal femur bone mineral density (BMD) per year (g/cm2 year‐1) · women with primary biliary cirrhosis.
1 finding from 1 review
- Hormone replacement for osteoporosis in women with primary biliary cirrhosis 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted2 studies · 36 participantsVery low
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) vs placebo or no intervention
Liver morbidity · women with primary biliary cirrhosis.
It is very uncertain whether hormone replacement changes liver‐related morbidity compared with placebo or no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Hormone replacement for osteoporosis in women with primary biliary cirrhosis 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 1.07 [0.15, 7.63]2 studies · 49 participantsVery low
Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) vs placebo or no intervention
Bilirubin (µmol/L) · women with primary biliary cirrhosis.
1 finding from 1 review
- Hormone replacement for osteoporosis in women with primary biliary cirrhosis 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extracted2 studies · 36 participantsVery low
Monthly & PRN catheter replacement vs PRN catheter replacement
Symptomatic CAUTI as defined by trialists · adults with replacing long‐term indwelling urinary catheters
It is very uncertain whether monthly & PRN catheter replacement changes symptomatic CAUTI as defined by trialists compared with PRN catheter replacement (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Policies for replacing long‐term indwelling urinary catheters in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 0.35 [0.13, 0.95]1 study · 17 participantsVery low
Antibiotics at time of replacement vs no antibiotics at time of replacement
Adverse effects (Urinary tract trauma) ‐ not reported · adults with replacing long‐term indwelling urinary catheters
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Policies for replacing long‐term indwelling urinary catheters in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Antibiotics at time of replacement vs no antibiotics at time of replacement
Adverse effects (Death) · adults with replacing long‐term indwelling urinary catheters
It is very uncertain whether antibiotics at time of replacement changes adverse effects (Death) compared with no antibiotics at time of replacement (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
- Policies for replacing long‐term indwelling urinary catheters in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyRR 2.12 [0.2, 22.2]1 study · 70 participantsVery low
Antibiotics at time of replacement vs no antibiotics at time of replacement
Formal economic analysis ‐ not reported · adults with replacing long‐term indwelling urinary catheters
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Policies for replacing long‐term indwelling urinary catheters in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Monthly & PRN catheter replacement vs PRN catheter replacement
Participant satisfaction ‐ not reported · adults with replacing long‐term indwelling urinary catheters
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Policies for replacing long‐term indwelling urinary catheters in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found
Monthly & PRN catheter replacement vs PRN catheter replacement
Disease‐specific quality of life ‐ not reported · adults with replacing long‐term indwelling urinary catheters
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
- Policies for replacing long‐term indwelling urinary catheters in adults 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes onlyno estimate extractedStudies not reportedNo studies found