Cochrane · systematic review · CD011115

Policies for replacing long‐term indwelling urinary catheters in adults

Cooper, FPM, Alexander, CE, Sinha, S, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2016 · Cochrane Library

IncontinenceAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
18
current version
GRADE rated
3
No studies
15
Included studies
NR
No studies 15 · 83.3%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 16.7%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Monthly & PRN catheter replacement versus PRN catheter replacement for replacing long‐term indwelling urinary catheters in adults

Population: adults with replacing long‐term indwelling urinary catheters
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Symptomatic CAUTI as defined by trialists
Monthly & PRN catheter replacement vs PRN catheter replacement
RR 0.35 [0.13, 0.95]1 study · 17 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Participant satisfaction ‐ not reported
Monthly & PRN catheter replacement vs PRN catheter replacement
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Condition‐specific quality‐of‐life measures ‐ not reported
Monthly & PRN catheter replacement vs PRN catheter replacement
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse effects (Urinary tract trauma) ‐ not reported
Monthly & PRN catheter replacement vs PRN catheter replacement
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse effects (Death) ‐ not reported
Monthly & PRN catheter replacement vs PRN catheter replacement
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Formal economic analysis ‐ not reported
Monthly & PRN catheter replacement vs PRN catheter replacement
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Antibiotics at time of replacement versus no antibiotics at time of replacement for replacing long‐term indwelling urinary catheters in adults

Population: adults with replacing long‐term indwelling urinary catheters
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Symptomatic CAUTI ‐ not reported
Antibiotics at time of replacement vs no antibiotics at time of replacement
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Participant satisfaction ‐ not reported
Antibiotics at time of replacement vs no antibiotics at time of replacement
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Condition‐specific quality of life measures ‐ not reported
Antibiotics at time of replacement vs no antibiotics at time of replacement
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse effects (Urinary tract trauma) ‐ not reported
Antibiotics at time of replacement vs no antibiotics at time of replacement
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse effects (Death)
Antibiotics at time of replacement vs no antibiotics at time of replacement
RR 2.12 [0.2, 22.2]1 study · 70 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Formal economic analysis ‐ not reported
Antibiotics at time of replacement vs no antibiotics at time of replacement
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Sterile water versus 0.05% chlorohexidine gluconate for periurethral cleansing during replacement for replacing long‐term indwelling urinary catheters in adults

Population: adults with replacing long‐term indwelling urinary catheters
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Symptomatic CAUTI at 14 days after replacement
Sterile water vs 0.05% chlorohexidine gluconate
no estimate extracted1 study · 16 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias
Participant satisfaction ‐ not reported
Sterile water vs 0.05% chlorohexidine gluconate
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Condition‐specific quality of life measures ‐ not reported
Sterile water vs 0.05% chlorohexidine gluconate
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse effects (Urinary tract trauma) ‐ not reported
Sterile water vs 0.05% chlorohexidine gluconate
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Adverse effects (Death) ‐ not reported
Sterile water vs 0.05% chlorohexidine gluconate
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Formal economic analysis ‐ not reported
Sterile water vs 0.05% chlorohexidine gluconate
no estimate extractedNRNo studies